Cited by 103Ion channel regulation and functionEpilepsy research and treatmentCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

An Epilepsy-Associated KCNT1 Mutation Enhances Excitability of Human iPSC-Derived Neurons by Increasing Slack KNa Currents

Open access
Quraishi, Imran H., Stern, Shani, Mangan, Kile P., Zhang, Yalan, Ali, Syed R., Mercier, Michael R., Marchetto, Maria C., McLachlan, Michael J. +3 more·2019·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Mutations in the KCNT1 (Slack, KNa1.1) sodium-activated potassium channel produce severe epileptic encephalopathies. Expression in heterologous systems has shown that the disease-causing mutations give rise to channels that have increased current amplitude. It is not known, however, whether such gain of function occurs in human neurons, nor whether such increased KNa current is expected to suppress or increase the excitability of cortical neurons. Using genetically engineered human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived neurons, we have now found that sodium-dependent potassium currents are increased several-fold in neurons bearing a homozygous P924L mutation. In current-clamp recordings, the increased KNa current in neurons with the P924L mutation acts to shorten the duration of action potentials and to increase the amplitude of the afterhyperpolarization that follows each action potential. Strikingly, the number of action potentials that were evoked by depolarizing currents as well as maximal firing rates were increased in neurons expressing the mutant channel. In networks of spontaneously active neurons, the mean firing rate, the occurrence of rapid bursts of action potentials, and the intensity of firing during the burst were all increased in neurons with the P924L Slack mutation. The feasibility of an increased KNa current to increase firing rates independent of any compensatory changes was validated by numerical simulations. Our findings indicate that gain-of-function in Slack KNa channels causes hyperexcitability in both isolated neurons and in neural networks and occurs by a cell-autonomous mechanism that does not require network interactions. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTKCNT1 mutations lead to severe epileptic encephalopathies for which there are no effective treatments. This study is the first demonstration that a KCNT1 mutation increases the Slack current in neurons. It also provides the first explanation for how this increased potassium current induces hyperexcitability, which could be the underlining factor causing seizures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.1628-18.2019

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Functional studies show a range of GOFs due to increased potassium current amplitude, correlating with phenotypic severity in KCNT1 DEEs.

    “Functional studies show a range of GOFs due to increased potassium current amplitude, correlating with phenotypic severity 56,58 .”

    From Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (2024) · cites this paper as [58]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) reports increased Slack potassium currents and gain of function across many epilepsy-associated KCNT1 mutations. The Discussion (page unavailable) describes a spectrum of epilepsy phenotypes, but does not say that the magnitude of current increase correlates with phenotypic severity. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 74 · Cited by 103

Authors
Quraishi, I. H., Stern, S., Mangan, K. P., Zhang, Y., Ali, S. R., Mercier, M. R., Marchetto, M. C., McLachlan, M. J., Jones, E. M., Gage, F. H., & Kaczmarek, L. K.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Salk Institute for Biological Studies (US)
  • Cellular Dynamics International (United States) (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2019-07-26
Volume
39
Issue
37
Pages
7438-7449
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2964406987
Cited by
103
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Swebilius Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001863)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS102239)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
KCNT1, gain-of-function mutations, epileptic encephalopathy, neuronal hyperexcitability, iPSC-derived neurons, action potential duration, afterhyperpolarization, firing rate, spontaneous neuronal activity
MeSH terms
Potassium Channels, Sodium-Activated, Action Potentials, Cell Differentiation, Epilepsy, Humans, Mutation, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, HEK293 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review