Dendritic Arborization and Spine Dynamics Are Abnormal in the Mouse Model of MECP2 Duplication Syndrome
Open accessAbstract
MECP2 duplication syndrome is a childhood neurological disorder characterized by intellectual disability, autism, motor abnormalities, and epilepsy. The disorder is caused by duplications spanning the gene encoding methyl-CpG-binding protein-2 (MeCP2), a protein involved in the modulation of chromatin and gene expression. MeCP2 is thought to play a role in maintaining the structural integrity of neuronal circuits. Loss of MeCP2 function causes Rett syndrome and results in abnormal dendritic spine morphology and decreased pyramidal dendritic arbor complexity and spine density. The consequences of MeCP2 overexpression on dendritic pathophysiology remain unclear. We used in vivo two-photon microscopy to characterize layer 5 pyramidal neuron spine turnover and dendritic arborization as a function of age in transgenic mice expressing the human MECP2 gene at twice the normal levels of MeCP2 (Tg1; Collins et al., 2004). We found that spine density in terminal dendritic branches is initially higher in young Tg1 mice but falls below control levels after postnatal week 12, approximately correlating with the onset of behavioral symptoms. Spontaneous spine turnover rates remain high in older Tg1 animals compared with controls, reflecting the persistence of an immature state. Both spine gain and loss rates are higher, with a net bias in favor of spine elimination. Apical dendritic arbors in both simple- and complex-tufted layer 5 Tg1 pyramidal neurons have more branches of higher order, indicating that MeCP2 overexpression induces dendritic overgrowth. P70S6K was hyperphosphorylated in Tg1 somatosensory cortex, suggesting that elevated mTOR signaling may underlie the observed increase in spine turnover and dendritic growth.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Overall, studies in Mecp2 animal models indicate that neuronal and dendritic morphology changes may appear transiently during development or be variously affected, depending on developmental stage and MeCp2 gain- or loss-of-function.
“Overall, studies in the Mecp2 animal models indicate that neuronal and dendritic morphology changes may appear transiently during development or be variously affected, depending on developmental stage and MeCp2 gain- or loss-of-function [64, 180].”
From Autism spectrum disorder: neuropathology and animal models (2017) · cites this paper as [180]
In mice overexpressing MECP2, new spines are more vulnerable to elimination than in wild type mice, resulting in a net loss of spines.
“However, new spines are more vulnerable to elimination than in wild type mice, resulting in a net loss of spines (Jiang et al., 2013).”
From Spatiotemporal dynamics of dendritic spines in the living brain (2014) · cites this paper as Jiang et al., 2013
In mice overexpressing MECP2, both spine gains and losses are elevated.
“In mice overexpressing MECP2, a Rett Syndrome related gene, it has been found that both spine gains and losses are elevated.”
From Spatiotemporal dynamics of dendritic spines in the living brain (2014) · cites this paper as Jiang et al., 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 88 · Cited by 129
- Authors
- Jiang, M., Ash, R. T., Baker, S. A., Suter, B., Ferguson, A., Park, J., Rudy, J., Torsky, S. P., Chao, H.-T., Zoghbi, H. Y., & Smirnakis, S. M.
- Affiliations
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2013-12-11
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 50
- Pages
- 19518-19533
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC3858623
- OpenAlex
- W1984341379
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 88
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 11
- FWCI
- 9.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS057819)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (KL2 HD4164S, P30HD024064)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Keywords
- MECP2 duplication syndrome, dendritic branching, layer 5 pyramidal neurons, spine density, mTOR signaling, p70S6K phosphorylation, somatosensory cortex, intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder, epilepsy, transgenic mouse model
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Dendrites, Disease Models, Animal, Neurons, Somatosensory Cortex, Mental Retardation, X-Linked, X-Linked Intellectual Disability, Dendritic Spines, Mice, Methyl-CpG-Binding Protein 2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review