Nicotinic Stimulation Produces Multiple Forms of Increased Glutamatergic Synaptic Transmission
Open accessAbstract
Synaptic modulation and long-term synaptic changes are thought to be the cellular correlates for learning and memory (Madison et al., 1991; Aiba et al., 1994; Goda and Stevens, 1996). The hippocampus is a center for learning and memory that receives abundant cholinergic innervation and has a high density of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) (Wada et al., 1989; Woolf, 1991). We report that strong, brief stimulation of nAChRs enhanced hippocampal glutamatergic synaptic transmission on two independent time scales and altered the relationship between consecutively evoked synaptic currents. The nicotinic synaptic enhancement required extracellular calcium and was produced by the activation of presynaptic α7-containing nAChRs. Although one form of glutamatergic enhancement lasted only for seconds, another form lasted for minutes after the nicotinic stimulation had ceased and the nicotinic agonist had been washed away. The synaptic enhancement lasting minutes suggests that nAChR activity can initiate calcium-dependent mechanisms that are known to induce glutamatergic synaptic plasticity. The results with evoked synaptic currents showed that nAChR activity can alter the relationship between the incoming presynaptic activity and outgoing postsynaptic signaling along glutamatergic fibers. Thus, the same information arriving along the same glutamatergic afferents will be processed differently when properly timed nicotinic activity converges onto the glutamatergic presynaptic terminals. Influencing information processing at glutamatergic synapses may be one way in which nicotinic cholinergic activity influences cognitive processes. Disruption of these nicotinic cholinergic mechanisms may contribute to the deficits associated with the degeneration of cholinergic functions during Alzheimer’s disease.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nicotinic receptor activation enhances the influence of afferent synaptic input in the hippocampus, including glutamatergic input to interneurons.
“Similar to thalamic input to neocortex, nicotinic receptor activation enhances the influence of afferent synaptic input in the hippocampus (Radcliffe and Dani, 1998; Giocomo and Hasselmo, 2005) including glutamatergic input to interneurons (Alkondon and Albuquerque, 2002).”
From Modes and models of forebrain cholinergic neuromodulation of cognition (2011) · cites this paper as Radcliffe and Dani, 1998
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 87 · Cited by 271
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Radcliffe KA, Fisher J, Gray R, Dani JA (1998) Nicotine potentiates glutamate and GABA synaptic transmission. Ann N Y Acad Sci, in press.
- Authors
- Radcliffe, K. A., & Dani, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- ORCID
- Dani, John A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1998-09-15
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 7075-7083
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6793238
- OpenAlex
- W2144573332
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 6.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA09411, R01DA009411)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 21229, R37NS021229, R01NS021229)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, glutamatergic neurotransmission, hippocampus, synaptic plasticity, presynaptic modulation, cholinergic innervation, learning and memory, Alzheimer's disease, cholinergic degeneration
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cells, Cultured, Electrophysiology, Hippocampus, Learning, Memory, Synaptic Transmission, Neurons, Nicotine, Receptors, Nicotinic, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Glutamic Acid, Nicotinic Agonists, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review