The convergence of information about rewarding and aversive stimuli in single neurons
Open accessAbstract
Neuroscientists, psychologists, clinicians, and economists have long been interested in how individuals weigh information about potential rewarding and aversive stimuli to make decisions and to regulate their emotions. However, we know relatively little about how appetitive and aversive systems interact in the brain, as most prior studies have investigated only one valence of reinforcement. Previous work has suggested that primate orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) represents information about the reward value of stimuli. We therefore investigated whether OFC also represents information about aversive stimuli, and, if so, whether individual neurons process information about both rewarding and aversive stimuli. Monkeys performed a trace conditioning task in which different novel abstract visual stimuli (conditioned stimuli, CSs) predicted the occurrence of one of three unconditioned stimuli (USs): a large liquid reward, a small liquid reward, or an aversive air-puff. Three lines of evidence suggest that information about rewarding and aversive stimuli converges in individual neurons in OFC. First, OFC neurons often responded to both rewarding and aversive USs, despite their different sensory features. Second, OFC neural responses to CSs often encoded information about both potential rewarding and aversive stimuli, even though these stimuli differed in both valence and sensory modality. Finally, OFC neural responses were correlated with monkeys' behavioral use of information about both rewarding and aversive CS-US associations. These data indicate that processing of appetitive and aversive stimuli converges at the single cell level in OFC, providing a possible substrate for executive and emotional processes that require using information from both appetitive and aversive systems.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PFo neurons can represent value independent of stimulus identity.
“Although PFo has long been thought to represent positive and negative valuations, it has only recently been appreciated that PFo neurons can represent value independent of stimulus identity (86–89).”
From Localization of Dysfunction in Major Depressive Disorder: Prefrontal Cortex and Amygdala (2011) · cites this paper as [88]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 206
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Pavlov IP 1927 Conditioned Reflexes London Oxford Univ. Press
- Authors
- Morrison, S. E., & Salzman, C. D.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2009-09-16
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 37
- Pages
- 11471-11483
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC2782596
- OpenAlex
- W2072009783
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 8.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- W. M. Keck Foundation
- National Institutes of Health (5r24ey015634-05)
- National Institute of Mental Health (F31MH081620, R01MH082017)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA020656)
- National Eye Institute (R24 EY-015634, P30EY019007)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- orbitofrontal cortex, reward value, aversive stimuli, trace conditioning, single neuron responses, valence, emotion regulation, decision-making, primate neurophysiology
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Haplorhini, Appetitive Behavior, Avoidance Learning, Behavior, Animal, Blinking, Conditioning, Classical, Conditioning, Operant, Discrimination Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Physical Stimulation, Reaction Time, Reinforcement Schedule, Reward, ROC Curve, Time Factors, Prefrontal Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review