Cited by 21Memory and Neural MechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Caution influences avoidance and approach behaviors differently

Open access
Zhou, Ji, Hormigo, Sebastian, Sajid, Muhammad S., Castro-Alamancos, Manuel A.·2022·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

While conflict between incompatible goals has well-known effects on actions, in many situations the same action may produce harmful or beneficial consequences during different periods in a nonconflicting manner, e.g., crossing the street during a red or green light. To avoid harm, subjects must be cautious to inhibit the action specifically when it is punished, as in passive avoidance, but act when it is beneficial, as in active avoidance or active approach. In mice of both sexes performing a signaled action to avoid harm or obtain reward, we found that addition of a new rule that punishes the action when it occurs unsignaled delays the timing of the signaled action in an apparent sign of increased caution. Caution depended on task signaling, contingency, and reinforcement type. Interestingly, caution became persistent when the signaled action was avoidance motivated by danger but was only transient when it was approach motivated by reward. Although caution is represented by the activity of neurons in the midbrain, it developed independent of frontal cortex or basal ganglia output circuits. These results indicate that caution disrupts actions in different ways depending on the motivational state and may develop from unforeseen brain circuits. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Actions, such as crossing the street at a light, can have benefits during one light signal (getting somewhere) but can be harmful during a different signal (being run over). Humans must be cautious to cross the street during the period marked by the appropriate signal. In mice performing a signaled action to avoid harm or obtain reward, we found that addition of a new rule that punishes the action when it occurs unsignaled, delays the timing of the signaled action in an apparent sign of increased caution. Caution became persistent when the signaled action was motivated by danger, but not when it was motivated by reward. Moreover, the development of caution did not depend on prototypical frontal cortex circuits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.1892-21.2022

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exposure to VEEV TC-83 in a model predisposed to develop AD exacerbates the decline in cognition, heightening fear, anxiety, and caution; similar outcomes are observed in patients developing AD.

    “These measurements indicate that exposure to VEEV TC-83 in a model predisposed to develop AD exacerbates the decline in cognition, heightening fear, anxiety, and caution; similar outcomes are observed in patients developing AD (Zhou et al., 2022; Zielinski et al., 1993).”

    From Arbovirus infection increases the risk for the development of neurodegenerative disease pathology in the murine model (2024) · cites this paper as Zhou et al., 2022

    The experimental-design section describes studies in C57BL/6J mice, and the passages retrieved for VEEV TC-83 and Alzheimer’s disease do not address viral exposure, AD-related cognitive decline, or patients developing AD. The section ‘Action caution is not because of increased anxiety’ instead examines caution in an avoidance task and concludes that mice can be cautious without being anxious; it does not test the effects claimed here. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 49 · Cited by 21

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Dickinson A, Balleine B (2002) The role of learning in the operation of moti- vational systems. In: Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  2. Dickinson A, Gelder M, Gray J (1980) Contemporary animal learning theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Franklin KBJ, Paxinos G (2008) The mouse brain in stereotaxic coordinates, Ed 3. Amsterdam; Boston: Elsevier/Academic Press.
  4. Graeff FG, Zangrossi JH (2002) Animal models of anxiety disorders. In: Biological Psychiatry, (D'Haenen H, den Boer, JA, Willner P eds), pp 96-103. Hoboken:John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  5. Gray JA, McNaughton N (2000) The neuropsychology of anxiety: an enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system, Ed 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Mackintosh NJ (1983) Conditioning and associative learning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  7. McNaughton N, Corr PJ (2004) A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: fear/anxiety and defensive distance. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 28:285-305.
  8. Miller NE (1944) Experimental studies of conflict. In: Personality and the behavioural disorders (Huny JM, ed), pp 431-465. New York: Ronald Press.
  9. Mowrer OH (1960) Learning theory and behavior. New York: Wiley.
  10. Skinner BF (1938) The behavior of organisms: an experimental analysis. Oxford: Appleton-Century.
  11. Sutton RS, Barto AG (1998) Reinforcement learning: an introduction. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Authors
Zhou, J., Hormigo, S., Sajid, M. S., & Castro-Alamancos, M. A.
Affiliations
University of Connecticut (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2022-06-15
Volume
42
Issue
30
Pages
5899-5915
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W4282920228
Cited by
21
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R35NS097272, R01NS104810)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
cautions, avoidance behavior, approach behavior, action timing, punishment, reward, contingency, reinforcement type, reward motivation, midbrain neurons, frontal cortex, basal ganglia, mice
MeSH terms
Animals, Avoidance Learning, Basal Ganglia, Choice Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Mesencephalon, Reinforcement, Psychology, Reward, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review