Cited by 243Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory Processes and Influences

Basolateral Amygdala Noradrenergic Influences on Memory Storage Are Mediated by an Interaction between β- and α1-Adrenoceptors

Open access
Ferry, Barbara, Roozendaal, Benno, McGaugh, James L.·1999·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Extensive evidence indicates that norepinephrine modulates memory storage through an activation of β-adrenoceptors in the basolateral nucleus of the amygdala (BLA). Recent findings suggest that the effects of β-adrenergic activation on memory storage are influenced by α 1-adrenoceptor stimulation. Pharmacological findings indicate that activation of postsynaptic α 1-adrenoceptors potentiates β-adrenoceptor-mediated activation of cAMP formation. The present study examined whether inactivation of α 1-adrenoceptors in the BLA would alter the dose–response effects on memory storage of intra-BLA infusions of a β-adrenoceptor agonist, as well as that of a synthetic cAMP analog. Male Sprague Dawley rats received bilateral microinfusions into the BLA of either the β-adrenoceptor agonist clenbuterol (3–3000 pmol in 0.2 μl) or 8-bromoadenosine 3′:5′-cyclic monophosphate (8-bromo-cAMP) (0.2–7 nmol in 0.2 μl) alone or together with the α 1-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin (0.2 nmol) immediately after training in an inhibitory avoidance task. Retention was tested 48 hr later. Clenbuterol induced a dose-dependent enhancement of retention, and prazosin attenuated the dose–response effects of clenbuterol. Posttraining intra-BLA infusions of 8-bromo-cAMP also induced a dose-dependent enhancement of retention latencies. However, concurrent infusion of prazosin did not alter the dose–response effects of 8-bromo-cAMP. These findings are consistent with the view that α 1-adrenoceptors affect memory storage by modulating β-adrenoceptor activation in the BLA. Moreover, these findings are consistent with those of pharmacological studies indicating that β-adrenoceptors modulate memory storage by a direct coupling to adenylate cyclase, whereas α 1-receptors act indirectly by influencing the β-adrenoceptor-mediated influence on cAMP formation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.19-12-05119.1999

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High levels of catecholamines and glucocorticoids strengthen amygdala functions but weaken prefrontal cortex functioning, shifting the orchestration of brain responses from the prefrontal cortex to the amygdala.

    “These high levels of catecholamines and glucocorticoids strengthen amygdala functions, such as fear conditioning and consolidation of emotionally relevant information79,80, but weaken PFC functioning; thus they shift the orchestration of brain responses from the PFC to the amygdala.”

    From Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function (2009) · cites this paper as [79]

    The Discussion reports that β-adrenergic activation in the basolateral amygdala enhances memory storage, and the introductory passage reports that glucocorticoid-related memory enhancement depends on that region. This supports the cited portion about amygdala-mediated consolidation, but the paper does not establish that high hormone levels strengthen fear conditioning specifically. The citation precedes the sentence’s separate claim about weakened PFC functioning and a shift in control, so those claims are not attributed to this source here. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In contrast to that in PFC, high levels of catecholamines strengthen the affective responses of the amygdala, the habitual or compulsive responses of the striatum and sensory processing in the primary somatosensory cortex.

    “In contrast to that in PFC, high levels of catecholamines strengthen the affective responses of the amygdala22,64, the habitual or compulsive responses of the striatum65 and sensory processing in the primary somatosensory cortex66.”

    From Stress weakens prefrontal networks: molecular insults to higher cognition (2015) · cites this paper as [64]

    The Discussion (page unavailable in our copy) reports that activating adrenergic mechanisms in the basolateral amygdala enhances memory retention in rats. That supports an enhancing effect in the amygdala, but the paper measures memory storage, not affective responses, and does not establish a general effect of high catecholamine levels. This citation is attached to the amygdala clause, not the striatum or somatosensory-cortex clauses. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 47 · Cited by 243

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ferry B, McGaugh JL (1999) C lenbuterol administration into the baso- lateral amygdala posttraining enhances retention in an inhibitory avoid- ance task. Neurobiol Learn Mem, in press.
  2. Ferry B, Roozendaal B, McGaugh JL (1999) Involvement of ␣ 1 - adrenergic receptors in the basolateral amygdala in modulation of memory storage. Eur J Pharmacol, in press.
  3. Hardman JG, Limbird L E, Molinoff PB, Ruddon RW, Gilman AG, (1997) C atecholamines and sympathometic drugs: endogeneous cat- echolamines. In: The pharmacological basis of therapeutics (Goodman L S, Gilman A, eds), pp 204 -248. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Authors
Ferry, B., Roozendaal, B., & McGaugh, J. L.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1999-06-15
Volume
19
Issue
12
Pages
5119-5123
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1577271808
Cited by
243
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 19
FWCI
5.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fondation Fyssen
  • U.S. Public Health Service
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH012526, MH12526, R56MH012526)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
basolateral amygdala, noradrenergic modulation, memory storage, beta-adrenergic receptors, alpha1-adrenoceptors, clenbuterol, 8-bromo-cAMP, prazosin, passive avoidance, cAMP signaling, adenylate cyclase, norepinephrine, memory retention
MeSH terms
Cyclic AMP, Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists, Amygdala, Animals, Avoidance Learning, Behavior, Animal, Male, Memory, Norepinephrine, Prazosin, Reaction Time, Receptors, Adrenergic, alpha, Receptors, Adrenergic, beta, 8-Bromo Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review