The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Binocular Neurons in V1 of Awake Monkeys Are Selective for Absolute, Not Relative, Disparity
Open accessAbstract
Most neurophysiological accounts of disparity selectivity in neurons of the primary visual cortex (V1) imply that they are selective for absolute retinal disparities. By contrast, a number of psychophysical observations indicate that relative disparities play a more important role in depth perception. During recordings from disparity selective neurons in area V1 of awake behaving monkeys, we used a disparity feedback loop (Rashbass and Westheimer, 1961) to add controlled amounts of absolute disparity to a display containing both absolute and relative disparities. This manipulation changed the absolute disparity of all the visible features in the display but left unchanged the relative disparities signalled by these features. The addition of absolute disparities produced clear changes in the neural responses to unchanged external stimuli, which were well predicted by the measured change in absolute disparity: in 45/53 cases, the neuron maintained a consistent firing pattern with respect to absolute disparity so that the manipulation created no significant change in the absolute disparity preferred by the neuron. No neuron in V1 maintained a consistent relationship with relative disparity. We conclude that the relative disparity signals used in primate depth perception are constructed outside area V1.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mountcastle, V. B., Lynch, J. C., Georgopoulos, A., Sakata, H., & Acuna, C. (1975) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1975.38.4.871 · Cited by 2,061 · cited 1×
“After this initial training, each monkey was implanted (under general anesthesia) with scleral magnetic search coils (Judge et al., 1980) in both eyes and a head restraining device [modified after Mountcastle et al. (1975)].”
Method
Cited by
Cumming, B. G., & DeAngelis, G. C. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.203 · Cited by 422
Self-citationDeep Hierarchies in the Primate Visual Cortex: What Can We Learn for Computer Vision?
Kruger, N., Janssen, P., Kalkan, S., Lappe, M., Leonardis, A., Piater, J., Rodriguez-Sanchez, A. J., & Wiskott, L. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2012.272 · Cited by 362
Computational approaches to sensorimotor transformations
Pouget, A., & Snyder, L. H. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/81469 · Cited by 357
Perceptually Bistable Three-Dimensional Figures Evoke High Choice Probabilities in Cortical Area MT
Dodd, J. V., Krug, K., Cumming, B. G., & Parker, A. J. (2001) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.21-13-04809.2001 · Cited by 305
Self-citationVisual Responses in Monkey Areas V1 and V2 to Three-Dimensional Surface Configurations
Bakin, J. S., Nakayama, K., & Gilbert, C. D. (2000) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.20-21-08188.2000 · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Cumming, B. G., & Parker, A. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1999-07-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 5602-5618
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1912546291
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Binocular Neurons in V1 of Awake Monkeys Are Selective for Absolute, Not Relative, Disparity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.19-13-05602.1999
- The paper
- Cumming, B. G., & Parker, A. J. (1999). Binocular Neurons in V1 of Awake Monkeys Are Selective for Absolute, Not Relative, Disparity. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.19-13-05602.1999
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.