Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 377

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Motor Skills Training Enhances Lesion-Induced Structural Plasticity in the Motor Cortex of Adult Rats

Open access
Jones, Theresa A., Chu, Catherine J., Grande, Lucinda A., Gregory, Aurora D.·1999·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

To assess behavioral experience effects on synaptic plasticity after brain damage, the present study examined the effects of complex motor skills training (the acrobatic task) on synaptic changes in layer V of the motor cortex opposite unilateral damage to the forelimb sensorimotor cortex (FLsmc). Adult male rats were given lesions or sham operations followed by 28 d of training on the acrobatic task [acrobat condition (AC)]. As a motor activity control [motor control (MC)], lesion and sham animals were given simple repetitive exercise. Previously, FLsmc lesions and acrobatic training have independently been found to result in increases in synapse to neuron ratios in the intact motor cortex relative to controls, and both of these effects were replicated in the present study. In addition, acrobat training after lesions significantly increased layer V synapses per neuron relative to sham–AC and lesion–MC rats. Thus, the combination of acrobatic training and lesions resulted in an enhanced synaptogenic response. Synapse subtypes were also differentially affected by the conditions. Lesion–MC and sham–AC primarily had increases in the number of synapses per neuron formed by multiple synaptic boutons in comparison to sham–MC. In contrast, lesion–AC had increases in both multiple and single synapses. Multiple synaptic spines and perforated synapses were also differentially affected by training versus lesions. On tests of coordinated forelimb use, lesion–AC rats performed better than lesion–MC rats. In addition to supporting a link between behavioral experience and structural plasticity after brain damage, these findings suggest that adaptive neural plasticity may be enhanced using behavioral manipulations as “therapy.”

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.19-22-10153.1999

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

See all 377

Metadata

Authors
Jones, T. A., Chu, C. J., Grande, L. A., & Gregory, A. D.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1999-11-15
Volume
19
Issue
22
Pages
10153-10163
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1889533143
Cited by
377
References
44
FWCI
5.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Motor Skills Training Enhances Lesion-Induced Structural Plasticity in the Motor Cortex of Adult Rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.19-22-10153.1999
The paper
Jones, T. A., Chu, C. J., Grande, L. A., & Gregory, A. D. (1999). Motor Skills Training Enhances Lesion-Induced Structural Plasticity in the Motor Cortex of Adult Rats. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.19-22-10153.1999

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.