The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Motor Skills Training Enhances Lesion-Induced Structural Plasticity in the Motor Cortex of Adult Rats
Open accessAbstract
To assess behavioral experience effects on synaptic plasticity after brain damage, the present study examined the effects of complex motor skills training (the acrobatic task) on synaptic changes in layer V of the motor cortex opposite unilateral damage to the forelimb sensorimotor cortex (FLsmc). Adult male rats were given lesions or sham operations followed by 28 d of training on the acrobatic task [acrobat condition (AC)]. As a motor activity control [motor control (MC)], lesion and sham animals were given simple repetitive exercise. Previously, FLsmc lesions and acrobatic training have independently been found to result in increases in synapse to neuron ratios in the intact motor cortex relative to controls, and both of these effects were replicated in the present study. In addition, acrobat training after lesions significantly increased layer V synapses per neuron relative to sham–AC and lesion–MC rats. Thus, the combination of acrobatic training and lesions resulted in an enhanced synaptogenic response. Synapse subtypes were also differentially affected by the conditions. Lesion–MC and sham–AC primarily had increases in the number of synapses per neuron formed by multiple synaptic boutons in comparison to sham–MC. In contrast, lesion–AC had increases in both multiple and single synapses. Multiple synaptic spines and perforated synapses were also differentially affected by training versus lesions. On tests of coordinated forelimb use, lesion–AC rats performed better than lesion–MC rats. In addition to supporting a link between behavioral experience and structural plasticity after brain damage, these findings suggest that adaptive neural plasticity may be enhanced using behavioral manipulations as “therapy.”
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
GUNDERSEN, H. J. G., BENDTSEN, T. F., KORBO, L., MARCUSSEN, N., MØLLER, A., NIELSEN, K., NYENGAARD, J. R., PAKKENBERG, B., SØRENSEN, F. B., VESTERBY, A., et al. (1988) · APMIS · doi:10.1111/j.1699-0463.1988.tb05320.x · Cited by 2,929
Nudo, R. J., Wise, B. M., SiFuentes, F., & Milliken, G. W. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.272.5269.1791 · Cited by 1,911
Reactive astrocytes: cellular and molecular cues to biological function
Ridet, J. L., Privat, A., Malhotra, S. K., & Gage, F. H. (1997) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(97)01139-9 · Cited by 1,766
Black, J. E., Isaacs, K. R., Anderson, B. J., Alcantara, A. A., & Greenough, W. T. (1990) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.87.14.5568 · Cited by 1,161
Organization of motor and somatosensory neocortex in the albino rat
Hall, R. D., & Lindholm, E. P. (1974) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(74)90076-6 · Cited by 901
Robinson, T. E., & Kolb, B. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-21-08491.1997 · Cited by 704
Synaptogenesis and FOS Expression in the Motor Cortex of the Adult Rat after Motor Skill Learning
Kleim, J. A., Lussnig, E., Schwarz, E. R., Comery, T. A., & Greenough, W. T. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-14-04529.1996 · Cited by 539
Rosenzweig, M. R., Krech, D., Bennett, E. L., & Diamond, M. C. (1962) · Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0041137 · Cited by 506
Use-dependent growth of pyramidal neurons after neocortical damage
Jones, T., & Schallert, T. (1994) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.14-04-02140.1994 · Cited by 504
Self-citationTurner, A. M., & Greenough, W. T. (1985) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(85)90525-6 · Cited by 459
Cited by
Brain–computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation
Daly, J. J., & Wolpaw, J. R. (2008) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(08)70223-0 · Cited by 1,149
Repairing the human brain after stroke: I. Mechanisms of spontaneous recovery
Cramer, S. C. (2008) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.21393 · Cited by 875
Neuroplasticity in the context of motor rehabilitation after stroke
Dimyan, M. A., & Cohen, L. G. (2011) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2010.200 · Cited by 732
Voluntary exercise induces a BDNF-mediated mechanism that promotes neuroplasticity
Gómez-Pinilla, F., Ying, Z., Roy, R. R., Molteni, R., & Edgerton, V. R. (2002) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00152.2002 · Cited by 724
Adkins, D. L., Boychuk, J., Remple, M. S., & Kleim, J. A. (2006) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00515.2006 · Cited by 593
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, T. A., Chu, C. J., Grande, L. A., & Gregory, A. D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1999-11-15
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 10153-10163
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1889533143
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 5.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Motor Skills Training Enhances Lesion-Induced Structural Plasticity in the Motor Cortex of Adult Rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.19-22-10153.1999
- The paper
- Jones, T. A., Chu, C. J., Grande, L. A., & Gregory, A. D. (1999). Motor Skills Training Enhances Lesion-Induced Structural Plasticity in the Motor Cortex of Adult Rats. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.19-22-10153.1999
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.