Biphasic Modulation of Hippocampal Plasticity by Behavioral Stress and Basolateral Amygdala Stimulation in the Rat
Open accessAbstract
Explicit memory may depend on the hippocampus, whereas the amygdala may be part of an emotional memory system. Priming stimulation of the basolateral group of the amygdala (BLA) resulted in an enhanced long-term potentiation (LTP) in the dentate gyrus (DG) to perforant path (PP) stimulation 30, 90, 150, and 180 min after high-frequency stimulation (HFS). Exposure of rats to a behavioral stress is reported to inhibit DG LTP. Because the amygdala is thought to mediate emotional responses, we examined the apparent discrepancy between the effects of behavioral stress induced 1 hr before HFS to the PP and of amygdala priming on hippocampal plasticity by stimulating the BLA 1 hr before HFS to the PP. The two delayed protocols inhibited the expression of LTP to PP stimulation, whereas priming the BLA immediately before HFS to the PP enhanced DG LTP. Moreover, exposure to the behavioral stress blocked the enhancing effects of BLA priming on LTP. We propose that the activation of the BLA (either by behavioral stress or by direct electrical stimulation) has a biphasic effect on hippocampal plasticity: an immediate excitatory effect and a longer-lasting inhibitory effect.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Electrical stimulation of the amygdala can mimic the emotion-induced enhancement of hippocampal LTP.
“Electrical stimulation of the amygdala can mimic the emotion-induced enhancement of hippocampal LTP (Ikegaya et al. [210]; Akirav and Richter-Levin [148]; Akirav and Richter-Levin [211]; Frey et al. [212]; Akirav and Richter-Levin [213])”
From The Temporal Dynamics Model of Emotional Memory Processing: A Synthesis on the Neurobiological Basis of Stress-Induced Amnesia, Flashbulb and Traumatic Memories, and the Yerkes-Dodson Law (2007) · cites this paper as Akirav and Richter-Levin [148]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 250
- Authors
- Akirav, I., & Richter-Levin, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Haifa (IL)
- ORCID
- Akirav, Irit
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1999-12-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 10530-10535
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6782400
- OpenAlex
- W1824596871
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 2.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Keywords
- hippocampal plasticity, long-term potentiation, basolateral amygdala, behavioral stress, dentate gyrus, perforant path, high-frequency stimulation, emotional memory, declarative memory
- MeSH terms
- Amygdala, Animals, Electric Stimulation, Hippocampus, Male, Neuronal Plasticity, Stress, Psychological, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Long-Term Potentiation, Dentate Gyrus, Perforant Pathway, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review