Spatial generalization from learning dynamics of reaching movements
Open accessAbstract
When subjects practice reaching movements in a force field, they learn a new sensorimotor map that associates desired trajectories to motor commands. The map is formed in the brain with elements that allow for generalization beyond the region of training. We quantified spatial generalization properties of these elements by training in one extreme of the reachable space and testing near another. Training resulted in rotations in the preferred direction (PD) of activation of some arm muscles. We designed force fields that maintained a constant rotation in muscle PDs as the shoulder joint rotated in the horizontal plane. In such fields, training in a small region resulted in generalization to near and far work spaces (80 cm). In one such field, the forces on the hand reversed directions for a given hand velocity with respect to the location of original training. Despite this, there was generalization. However, if the field was such that the change in the muscle PDs reversed as the work spaces changed, then performance was worse than performance of naive subjects. We suggest that the sensorimotor map of arm dynamics is represented in the brain by elements that globally encode the position of the arm but locally encode its velocity. The elements have preferred directions of movement but are modulated globally by the position of the shoulder joint. We suggest that tuning properties of cells in the motor system influence behavior and that this influence is reflected in the way that we learn dynamics of reaching movements.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 249
- Authors
- Shadmehr, R., & Moussavi, Z. M. K.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- ORCID
- Shadmehr, Reza
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2000-10-15
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 7807-7815
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6772893
- OpenAlex
- W2156162813
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 3.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Johns Hopkins University
- Office of Naval Research
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 37422, R01NS037422, R56NS037422)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- spatial generalization, reaching movements, force fields, sensorimotor learning, preferred direction, arm dynamics
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Arm, Distance Perception, Electromyography, Hand, Humans, Joints, Learning, Models, Biological, Motor Skills, Pilot Projects, Psychomotor Performance, Space Perception, Muscle, Skeletal, Torque
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review