Cited by 249Motor Control and AdaptationMemory and Neural MechanismsTactile and Sensory Interactions

Spatial generalization from learning dynamics of reaching movements

Open access
Shadmehr, Reza, Moussavi, Zahra M. K.·2000·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

When subjects practice reaching movements in a force field, they learn a new sensorimotor map that associates desired trajectories to motor commands. The map is formed in the brain with elements that allow for generalization beyond the region of training. We quantified spatial generalization properties of these elements by training in one extreme of the reachable space and testing near another. Training resulted in rotations in the preferred direction (PD) of activation of some arm muscles. We designed force fields that maintained a constant rotation in muscle PDs as the shoulder joint rotated in the horizontal plane. In such fields, training in a small region resulted in generalization to near and far work spaces (80 cm). In one such field, the forces on the hand reversed directions for a given hand velocity with respect to the location of original training. Despite this, there was generalization. However, if the field was such that the change in the muscle PDs reversed as the work spaces changed, then performance was worse than performance of naive subjects. We suggest that the sensorimotor map of arm dynamics is represented in the brain by elements that globally encode the position of the arm but locally encode its velocity. The elements have preferred directions of movement but are modulated globally by the position of the shoulder joint. We suggest that tuning properties of cells in the motor system influence behavior and that this influence is reflected in the way that we learn dynamics of reaching movements.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.20-20-07807.2000

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 249

Authors
Shadmehr, R., & Moussavi, Z. M. K.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2000-10-15
Volume
20
Issue
20
Pages
7807-7815
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2156162813
Cited by
249
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 14
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Office of Naval Research
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 37422, R01NS037422, R56NS037422)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
spatial generalization, reaching movements, force fields, sensorimotor learning, preferred direction, arm dynamics
MeSH terms
Adult, Arm, Distance Perception, Electromyography, Hand, Humans, Joints, Learning, Models, Biological, Motor Skills, Pilot Projects, Psychomotor Performance, Space Perception, Muscle, Skeletal, Torque

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review