Integrin Dynamics Produce a Delayed Stage of Long-Term Potentiation and Memory Consolidation
Open accessAbstract
Memory consolidation theory posits that newly acquired information passes through a series of stabilization steps before being firmly encoded. We report here that in rat and mouse, hippocampus cell adhesion receptors belonging to the β1-integrin family exhibit dynamic properties in adult synapses and that these contribute importantly to a previously unidentified stage of consolidation. Quantitative dual immunofluorescence microscopy showed that induction of long-term potentiation (LTP) by theta burst stimulation (TBS) activates β1 integrins, and integrin-signaling kinases, at spine synapses in adult hippocampal slices. Neutralizing antisera selective for β1 integrins blocked these effects. TBS-induced integrin activation was brief (<7 min) and followed by an ∼45 min period during which the adhesion receptors did not respond to a second application of TBS. Brefeldin A, which blocks integrin trafficking to the plasma membrane, prevented the delayed recovery of integrin responses to TBS. β1 integrin-neutralizing antisera erased LTP when applied during, but not after, the return of integrin responsivity. Similarly, infusions of anti-β1 into rostral mouse hippocampus blocked formation of long-term, object location memory when started 20 min after learning but not 40 min later. The finding that β1 integrin neutralization was effective in the same time window for slice and behavioral experiments strongly suggests that integrin recovery triggers a temporally discrete, previously undetected second stage of consolidation for both LTP and memory.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is hypothesized that subsequent theta-burst stimuli at these synaptic contacts cannot induce spine enlargement or LTP until after this replacement has occurred, thus accounting for the refractory period of about 1 hour.
“it is hypothesized82 that subsequent theta-burst stimuli at these synaptic contacts cannot induce spine enlargement or LTP until after this replacement has occurred, thus accounting for the refractory period of ~1 hour in order for a second theta-burst stimulus to yield additional LTP.”
From The right time to learn: Mechanisms and optimization of spaced learning (2016) · cites this paper as [82]
These receptors are then replaced by vesicular transport of new receptors over a period of about 40-60 minutes.
“These receptors are then replaced by vesicular transport of new receptors over a period of ~40–60 minutes”
From The right time to learn: Mechanisms and optimization of spaced learning (2016) · cites this paper as [82]
In rat hippocampal slices, theta-burst stimuli lead to proteolytic inactivation of integrin receptors at stimulated dendritic spines.
“In rat hippocampal slices, theta-burst stimuli lead to proteolytic inactivation of integrin receptors at stimulated dendritic spines82.”
From The right time to learn: Mechanisms and optimization of spaced learning (2016) · cites this paper as [82]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 57 · Cited by 93
- Authors
- Babayan, A. H., Kramár, E. A., Barrett, R. M., Jafari, M., Häettig, J., Chen, L. Y., Rex, C. S., Lauterborn, J. C., Wood, M. A., Gall, C. M., & Lynch, G.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2012-09-12
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 37
- Pages
- 12854-12861
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC3752079
- OpenAlex
- W2068259590
- Cited by
- 93
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH082042, MH082042, MH083396, R01MH081004, MH081004, MH85494, F31MH083396, F31MH085494)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P01NS045260, NS045260)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Cell Adhesion Molecules Research
- Keywords
- beta1 integrin, memory consolidation, long-term potentiation, hippocampus, integrin trafficking, brefeldin A, object location memory, theta burst stimulation, spatial memory
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Hippocampus, Male, Memory, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neuronal Plasticity, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Long-Term Potentiation, Neural Cell Adhesion Molecules, Integrin beta1, Mice, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review