The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Temporal Contrast Adaptation in the Input and Output Signals of Salamander Retinal Ganglion Cells
Open accessAbstract
We investigated how the light-evoked input and output signals of salamander retinal ganglion cells adapt to changes in temporal contrast, i.e., changes in the depth of the temporal fluctuations in the light intensity about the mean. Increasing the temporal contrast sped the kinetics and reduced the sensitivity of both the light-evoked input currents measured at the ganglion cell soma and the output spike trains of the cell. The decline in sensitivity of the input currents after an increase in contrast had two distinct kinetic components with fast (<2 sec) and slow (>10 sec) time constants. The recovery of sensitivity after a decrease in contrast was dominated by a single component with an intermediate (4–18 sec) time constant. Contrast adaptation differed for on and off cells, with both the kinetics and amplitude of the light-evoked currents of off cells adapting more strongly than those of on cells. Contrast adaptation in the input currents of a ganglion cell, however, was unable to account for the extent of adaptation in the output spike trains of the cell, indicating that mechanisms intrinsic to the ganglion cell contributed. Indeed, when fluctuating currents were injected into a ganglion cell, the sensitivity of spike generation decreased with increased current variance. Pharmacological experiments indicated that adaptation of spike generation to the current variance was attributable to properties of tetrodotoxin-sensitive Na+channels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Eye Smarter than Scientists Believed: Neural Computations in Circuits of the Retina
Gollisch, T., & Meister, M. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.12.009 · Cited by 795
Fractional differentiation by neocortical pyramidal neurons
Lundstrom, B. N., Higgs, M. H., Spain, W. J., & Fairhall, A. L. (2008) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2212 · Cited by 678
Fast and Slow Contrast Adaptation in Retinal Circuitry
Baccus, S. A., & Meister, M. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)01050-4 · Cited by 515
Interpreting the retinal neural code for natural scenes: from computations to neurons
Maheswaranathan, N., McIntosh, L. T., Tanaka, H., Grant, S., Kastner, D. B., Melander, J. B., Nayebi, A., Brezovec, L. E., Wang, J. H., Ganguli, S., et al. (2023) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2023.06.007 · Cited by 52
“High contrast stimuli cause ganglion cells to respond with a time course that is faster, more biphasic, and less sensitive than during low contrast.(19,26,27) These properties can be assessed with an LN model consisting of a linear temporal filter and static nonlinearity fit at different contrasts.”
Multiple Mechanisms for Contrast Adaptation in the Retina
Demb, J. B. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)01100-5 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, K. J., & Rieke, F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2001-01-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 287-299
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2116166332
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temporal Contrast Adaptation in the Input and Output Signals of Salamander Retinal Ganglion Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.21-01-00287.2001
- The paper
- Kim, K. J., & Rieke, F. (2001). Temporal Contrast Adaptation in the Input and Output Signals of Salamander Retinal Ganglion Cells. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.21-01-00287.2001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.