Sleep Restriction Impairs Blood–Brain Barrier Function
Open accessAbstract
The blood–brain barrier (BBB) is a large regulatory and exchange interface between the brain and peripheral circulation. We propose that changes of the BBB contribute to many pathophysiological processes in the brain of subjects with chronic sleep restriction (CSR). To achieve CSR that mimics a common pattern of human sleep loss, we quantified a new procedure of sleep disruption in mice by a week of consecutive sleep recording. We then tested the hypothesis that CSR compromises microvascular function. CSR not only diminished endothelial and inducible nitric oxide synthase, endothelin1, and glucose transporter expression in cerebral microvessels of the BBB, but it also decreased 2-deoxy-glucose uptake by the brain. The expression of several tight junction proteins also was decreased, whereas the level of cyclooxygenase-2 increased. This coincided with an increase of paracellular permeability of the BBB to the small tracers sodium fluorescein and biotin. CSR for 6 d was sufficient to impair BBB structure and function, although the increase of paracellular permeability returned to baseline after 24 h of recovery sleep. This merits attention not only in neuroscience research but also in public health policy and clinical practice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
BBB impairment occurs early in the mouse model of chronic sleep deprivation and the rat model of social isolation.
“Additionally, BBB impairment also occurs early in the mouse model of chronic sleep deprivation (241) and the rat model of social isolation (524).”
From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [241]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 208
- Authors
- He, J., Hsuchou, H., He, Y., Kastin, A. J., Wang, Y., & Pan, W.
- Affiliations
- Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2014-10-29
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 44
- Pages
- 14697-14706
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC4212067
- OpenAlex
- W1990996033
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 8.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK-54880, R01DK092245, DK-92245, R01DK054880, R56DK054880)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS62291, R01NS062291)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Keywords
- sleep restriction, blood-brain barrier, chronic sleep loss, microvascular function, paracellular permeability, tight junction proteins, nitric oxide synthase, endothelin-1, glucose transporters, cyclooxygenase-2, cerebral microvasculature, 2-deoxyglucose uptake, recovery sleep
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neurons, Permeability, Sleep, Sleep Deprivation, Down-Regulation, Endothelial Cells, Glucose Transporter Type 1, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review