The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of IPSCs Evoked by Spiny and Fast-Spiking Neurons in the Neostriatum
Open accessAbstract
Most neurons in the neostriatum are GABAergic spiny projection neurons with extensive local axon collaterals innervating principally other spiny projection neurons. The other source of GABAergic inputs to spiny neurons derives from a small number of interneurons, of which the best characterized are the parvalbumin-containing, fast-spiking interneurons. Spiny neuron collateral inhibition was not demonstrated until recently, because the IPSPs recorded at the soma are surprisingly small. In contrast, interneuronal inhibition was readily detected, comprising much larger IPSPs. Here, we report the application of quantal analysis and compartmental modeling to compare and contrast IPSCs in spiny neurons originating from axon collaterals and interneurons. The results indicate that individual release sites at spiny and interneuron synapses have similar quantal sizes and baseline release probabilities. Interneuronal unitary IPSCs are several times larger because of their proximal location on the neuron and because they have a larger number of transmitter release sites. Despite the small amount of current they can deliver to the soma, spiny cell collateral synapses had moderately high baseline release probabilities (0.5-0.9), suggesting that they are not weak because of some form of depression or modulation. The size of unitary collateral synaptic currents increased monotonically during development. These results argue against models of competitive inhibition in neostriatum, including those in which competitive inhibition is transiently effective during development and learning, and suggest a different role for the spiny cell axon collaterals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A translational profiling approach for the molecular characterization of CNS cell types
Heiman, M., Schaefer, A., Gong, S., Peterson, J. D., Day, M., Ramsey, K. E., Suárez-Fariñas, M., Schwarz, C., Stephan, D. A., Surmeier, D. J., et al. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.028 · Cited by 1,134
Functional diversity and specificity of neostriatal interneurons
Tepper, J. M., & Bolam, J. P. (2004) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2004.10.003 · Cited by 526
Self-citationCortical and basal ganglia contributions to habit learning and automaticity
Ashby, F. G., Turner, B. O., & Horvitz, J. C. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.02.001 · Cited by 481
Taverna, S., Ilijic, E., & Surmeier, D. J. (2008) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5493-07.2008 · Cited by 399
Globus pallidus external segment
Kita, H. (2007) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(06)60007-1 · Cited by 228
Metadata
- Authors
- Koos, T., Tepper, J. M., & Wilson, C. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2004-09-08
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 36
- Pages
- 7916-7922
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2117464894
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of IPSCs Evoked by Spiny and Fast-Spiking Neurons in the Neostriatum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.2163-04.2004
- The paper
- Koos, T., Tepper, J. M., & Wilson, C. J. (2004). Comparison of IPSCs Evoked by Spiny and Fast-Spiking Neurons in the Neostriatum. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2163-04.2004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.