Modulation of cerebellar excitability by polarity-specific noninvasive direct current stimulation
Open accessAbstract
The cerebellum is a crucial structure involved in movement control and cognitive processing. Noninvasive stimulation of the cerebellum results in neurophysiological and behavioral changes, an effect that has been attributed to modulation of cerebello-brain connectivity. At rest, the cerebellum exerts an overall inhibitory tone over the primary motor cortex (M1), cerebello-brain inhibition (CBI), likely through dentate-thalamo-cortical connections. The level of excitability of this pathway before and after stimulation of the cerebellum, however, has not been directly investigated. In this study, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation to determine changes in M1, brainstem, and CBI before and after 25 min of anodal, cathodal, or sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied over the right cerebellar cortex. We hypothesized that anodal tDCS would result in an enhancement of CBI and cathodal would decrease it, relative to sham stimulation. We found that cathodal tDCS resulted in a clear decrease of CBI, whereas anodal tDCS increased it, in the absence of changes after sham stimulation. These effects were specific to the cerebello-cortical connections with no changes in other M1 or brainstem excitability measures. The cathodal effect on CBI was found to be dependent on stimulation intensity and lasted up to 30 min after the cessation of tDCS. These results suggest that tDCS can modulate in a focal and polarity-specific manner cerebellar excitability, likely through changes in Purkinje cell activity. Therefore, direct current stimulation of the cerebellum may have significant potential implications for patients with cerebellar dysfunction as well as to motor control studies.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
TMS coils with deeper magnetic field penetration may more effectively engage cerebellar targets.
“TMS coils with deeper magnetic field penetration may more effectively engage cerebellar targets (Galea et al., 2009; Hardwick et al., 2014)”
From A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial of cerebellar intermittent theta burst stimulation for bipolar disorder: Safety, tolerability, mood and cognitive effects (2025) · cites this paper as Galea et al., 2009
The Experimental procedures (TMS of the cerebellum and brainstem; page not provided) describe using a double-cone coil over the cerebellum, and the Cerebellar excitability section describes using TMS there to assess cerebello-brain inhibition. The paper does not say that this coil penetrates more deeply or that deeper penetration improves engagement of cerebellar targets. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 38 · Cited by 472
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- Battaglia F Quartarone A Ghilardi MF Dattola R Bagnato S Rizzo V Morgante L Girlanda P Unilateral cerebellar stroke disrupts movement preparation and motor imagery Clin Neurophysiol 2006 117 1009 1016 16516543
- Boggio PS Ferrucci R Rigonatti SP Covre P Nitsche M Pascual-Leone A Fregni F Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on working memory in patients with Parkinson's disease J Neurol Sci 1 2006 249 1 31 38 16843494
- Cerminara NL Apps R Marple-Horvat DE An internal model of a moving visual target in the lateral cerebellum J Physiol 2009 587 429 442 19047203 PMC2670054
- Cheeran B Talelli P Mori F Koch G Suppa A Edwards M Houlden H Bhatia K Greenwood R Rothwell JC A common polymorphism in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene (BDNF) modulates human cortical plasticity and the response to rTMS J Physiol 2008 586 5717 5725 18845611 PMC2655403
- Chen H Hua SE Smith MA Lenz FA Shadmehr R Effects of human cerebellar thalamus disruption on adaptive control of reaching Cereb Cortex 2006 16 1462 1473 16357337 PMC1560096
- Daskalakis ZJ Paradiso GO Christensen BK Fitzgerald PB Gunraj C Chen R Exploring the connectivity between the cerebellum and motor cortex in humans J Physiol 2004 557 689 700 15047772 PMC1665103
- Ferrucci R Marceglia S Vergari M Cogiamanian F Mrakic-Sposta S Mameli F Zago S Barbieri S Priori A Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation impairs the practice-dependent proficiency increase in working memory J Cogn Neurosci 2008 20 1687 1697 18345990
- Fierro B Giglia G Palermo A Pecoraro C Scalia S Brighina F Modulatory effects of 1 Hz rTMS over the cerebellum on motor cortex excitability Exp Brain Res 2007 176 440 447 16917771
- Gandiga PC Hummel FC Cohen LG Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation Clin Neurophysiol 2006 117 845 850 16427357
- Gironell A Kulisevsky J Lorenzo J Barbanoj M Pascual-Sedano B Otermin P Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the cerebellum in essential tremor: a controlled study Arch Neurol 2002 59 413 417 11890845
- Hummel F Celnik P Giraux P Floel A Wu WH Gerloff C Cohen LG Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke Brain 2005 128 490 499 15634731
- Imamizu H Miyauchi S Tamada T Sasaki Y Takino R Putz B Yoshioka T Kawato M Human cerebellar activity reflecting an acquired internal model of a new tool Nature 2000 403 192 195 10646603
- Iyer MB Mattu U Grafman J Lomarev M Sato S Wassermann EM Safety and cognitive effect of frontal DC brain polarization in healthy individuals Neurology 2005 64 5 872 875 15753425
- Kelly RM Strick PL Cerebellar loops with motor cortex and prefrontal cortex of a nonhuman primate J Neurosci 2003 23 8432 8444 12968006 PMC6740694
- Koch G Mori F Marconi B Codeca C Pecchioli C Salerno S Torriero S Lo Gerfo E Mir P Oliveri M Caltagirone C Changes in intracortical circuits of the human motor cortex following theta burst stimulation of the lateral cerebellum Clin Neurophysiol 2008 119 2559 2569 18824403
- Kuo MF Grosch J Fregni F Paulus W Nitsche MA Focusing effect of acetylcholine on neuroplasticity in the human motor cortex J Neurosci 2007 27 14442 14447 18160652 PMC6673455
- Langguth B Eichhammer P Zowe M Landgrebe M Binder H Sand P Hajak G Modulating cerebello-thalamocortical pathways by neuronavigated cerebellar repetitive transcranial stimulation (rTMS) Neurophysiol Clin 2008 38 289 295 18940616
- Liepert J Kucinski T Tuscher O Pawlas F Baumer T Weiller C Motor cortex excitability after cerebellar infarction Stroke 2004 35 2484 2488 15375297
- Middleton FA Strick PL Basal ganglia and cerebellar loops: motor and cognitive circuits Brain Res Brain Res Rev 2000 31 236 250 10719151
- Nitsche MA Paulus W Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans Neurology 2001 57 1899 1901 11723286
- Nitsche MA Liebetanz D Antal A Lang N Tergau F Paulus W Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation--technical, safety and functional aspects Suppl Clin Neurophysiol 2003a 56 255 276 14677403
- Nitsche MA Fricke K Henschke U Schlitterlau A Liebetanz D Lang N Henning S Tergau F Paulus W Pharmacological modulation of cortical excitability shifts induced by transcranial direct current stimulation in humans J Physiol 2003b 553 293 301 12949224 PMC2343495
- Oliveri M Koch G Torriero S Caltagirone C Increased facilitation of the primary motor cortex following 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralateral cerebellum in normal humans Neurosci Lett 2005 376 188 193 15721219
- Pinto AD Chen R Suppression of the motor cortex by magnetic stimulation of the cerebellum Exp Brain Res 2001 140 505 510 11685404
- Purpura DP McMurtry JG Intracellular Activities and Evoked Potential Changes during Polarization of Motor Cortex J Neurophysiol 1965 28 166 185 14244793
- Reis J Swayne OB Vandermeeren Y Camus M Dimyan MA Harris-Love M Perez MA Ragert P Rothwell JC Cohen LG Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the understanding of cortical mechanisms involved in motor control J Physiol 2008 586 325 351 17974592 PMC2375593
- Rossini PM Barker AT Berardelli A Caramia MD Caruso G Cracco RQ Dimitrijevic MR Hallett M Katayama Y Lucking CH Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994 91 79 92 7519144
- Stefan K Cohen LG Duque J Mazzocchio R Celnik P Sawaki L Ungerleider L Classen J Formation of a motor memory by action observation J Neurosci 2005 25 9339 9346 16221842 PMC6725701
- Theoret H Haque J Pascual-Leone A Increased variability of paced finger tapping accuracy following repetitive magnetic stimulation of the cerebellum in humans Neurosci Lett 2001 306 29 32 11403950
- Ugawa Y Day BL Rothwell JC Thompson PD Merton PA Marsden CD Modulation of motor cortical excitability by electrical stimulation over the cerebellum in man J Physiol 1991 441 57 72 1816387 PMC1180185
- Ugawa Y Uesaka Y Terao Y Hanajima R Kanazawa I Magnetic stimulation of corticospinal pathways at the foramen magnum level in humans Ann Neurol 1994 36 618 624 7944293
- Ugawa Y Uesaka Y Terao Y Hanajima R Kanazawa I Magnetic stimulation over the cerebellum in humans Ann Neurol 1995 37 703 713 7778843
- Werhahn KJ Taylor J Ridding M Meyer BU Rothwell JC Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation over the cerebellum on the excitability of human motor cortex Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996 101 58 66 8625878
- Ziemann U Ishii K Borgheresi A Yaseen Z Battaglia F Hallett M Cincotta M Wassermann EM Dissociation of the pathways mediating ipsilateral and contralateral motor-evoked potentials in human hand and arm muscles J Physiol 1999 518 Pt 3 895 906 10420023 PMC2269467
- Authors
- Galea, J. M., Jayaram, G., Ajagbe, L., & Celnik, P.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2009-07-15
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 28
- Pages
- 9115-9122
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC2760225
- OpenAlex
- W2041989893
- Cited by
- 472
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 7.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD053793, R21HD060169)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- transcranial direct current stimulation, primary motor cortex, Purkinje cells, anodal stimulation, cathodal stimulation, brainstem excitability, cerebellar dysfunction, motor control
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Attention, Biophysics, Blinking, Brain Mapping, Brain Stem, Cerebellum, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Electromyography, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Cortex, Neuropsychological Tests, Pain, Muscle, Skeletal, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Biophysical Phenomena, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review