The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Role of Primate Substantia Nigra Pars Reticulata in Reward-Oriented Saccadic Eye Movement
Open accessAbstract
To test the hypothesis that the basal ganglia are related to reward-oriented saccades, we examined activity of substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr) neurons by using a one-direction-rewarded version of the memory-guided saccade task (1DR). Many SNr neurons changed (decreased or increased) their activity after and before a visual cue (post-cue and pre-cue activity). Post-cue decreases or increases tended to be larger to a contralateral cue. They were often modulated prospectively by the presence or absence of reward, either positively (enhanced in the rewarded condition) or negatively (enhanced in the nonrewarded condition). The positive reward modulation was more common among decreasing type neurons, whereas no such preference was observed among increasing type neurons. The reward-contingent decrease in SNr neuronal activity would facilitate rewarded saccades by inducing disinhibition in superior colliculus (SC) neurons. In contrast, the increase in SNr activity would suppress a saccade less selectively (rewarded or nonrewarded) by augmenting inhibition of SC neurons. The post-cue activity was often preceded by anticipatory pre-cue activity. Most typically, post-cue decrease was preceded by pre-cue decrease, selectively when the contralateral side was rewarded. This would reinforce the reward-oriented nature of SNr neuronal activity. The decreases and increases in SNr activity may be derived directly and indirectly, respectively, from the caudate (CD), where neurons show reward-contingent pre-cue and post-cue activity. These results suggest that the CD–SNr–SC mechanism would promote saccades oriented to reward.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Functional architecture of basal ganglia circuits: neural substrates of parallel processing
Alexander, G. E., & Crutcher, M. D. (1990) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(90)90107-l · Cited by 4,131
Models of Information Processing in the Basal Ganglia
(1994) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4708.001.0001 · Cited by 1,190
Cited by
Neuronal Reward and Decision Signals: From Theories to Data
Schultz, W. (2015) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00023.2014 · Cited by 1,126
The mammalian superior colliculus: laminar structure and connections
May, P. J. (2006) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(05)51011-2 · Cited by 676
Schultz, W. (2004) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.017 · Cited by 517
Cortico–basal ganglia circuit mechanism for a decision threshold in reaction time tasks
Lo, C.-C., & Wang, X.-J. (2006) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1722 · Cited by 505
Neuronal representations of cognitive state: reward or attention?
Maunsell, J. H. R. (2004) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.04.003 · Cited by 404
Metadata
- Authors
- Sato, M., & Hikosaka, O.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2002-03-15
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2363-2373
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2151316609
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of Primate Substantia Nigra Pars Reticulata in Reward-Oriented Saccadic Eye Movement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.22-06-02363.2002
- The paper
- Sato, M., & Hikosaka, O. (2002). Role of Primate Substantia Nigra Pars Reticulata in Reward-Oriented Saccadic Eye Movement. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.22-06-02363.2002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.