Does anticipation of pain affect cortical nociceptive systems?
Open accessAbstract
Anticipation of pain is a complex state that may influence the perception of subsequent noxious stimuli. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to study changes of activity of cortical nociceptive networks in healthy volunteers while they expected the somatosensory stimulation of one foot, which might be painful (subcutaneous injection of ascorbic acid) or not. Subjects had no previous experience of the noxious stimulus. Mean fMRI signal intensity increased over baseline values during anticipation and during actual stimulation in the putative foot representation area of the contralateral primary somatosensory cortex (SI). Mean fMRI signals decreased during anticipation in other portions of the contralateral and ipsilateral SI, as well as in the anteroventral cingulate cortex. The activity of cortical clusters whose signal time courses showed positive or negative correlations with the individual psychophysical pain intensity curve was also significantly affected during the waiting period. Positively correlated clusters were found in the contralateral SI and bilaterally in the anterior cingulate, anterior insula, and medial prefrontal cortex. Negatively correlated clusters were found in the anteroventral cingulate bilaterally. In all of these areas, changes during anticipation were of the same sign as those observed during pain but less intense ( approximately 30-40% as large as peak changes during actual noxious stimulation). These results provide evidence for top-down mechanisms, triggered by anticipation, modulating cortical systems involved in sensory and affective components of pain even in the absence of actual noxious input and suggest that the activity of cortical nociceptive networks may be directly influenced by cognitive factors.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Porro et al., changes in brain activation were similar for both pain and pain anticipation, except that the magnitude of changes was 30% to 40% lower during the anticipation of pain.
“The changes in brain activation were similar for both pain and pain anticipation, except that the magnitude of changes was 30% to 40% lower during the anticipation of pain.”
From Psychological aspects of persistent pain: Current state of the science (2004) · cites this paper as [95]
The ‘Significance of changes of the activity of cortical nociceptive circuits during anticipation of pain’ section reports that clusters encoding pain intensity also changed during anticipation, supporting overlap in the brain responses. Its Figure 5 caption compares fMRI signals during waiting and after stimulation, but the passages found do not report that anticipatory changes were 30%–40% lower. That numerical part of the claim is unsupported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPorro et al.'s functional magnetic resonance imaging study showed that both pain and the anticipation of pain produced changes in a number of brain areas including the contralateral S1 and bilaterally in the anterior cingulate cortex, anterior insula, and medial prefrontal cortex.
“conducted a functional magnetic resonance imaging study that showed that both pain and the anticipation of pain produced changes in a number of brain areas including the contralateral S1 and bilaterally in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), anterior insula, and medial prefrontal cortex.”
From Psychological aspects of persistent pain: Current state of the science (2004) · cites this paper as [95]
The results of fMRI experiment I replicate and extend previous findings by showing stronger involvement of neural structures involved in action anticipation and somatosensation when focusing on the sensory consequences of mechanically induced pain.
“Taken together, the results of fMRI experiment I replicate and extend previous findings concerning empathy for pain by showing a stronger involvement of neural structures involved in action anticipation and somatosensation when focusing on the sensory consequences of mechanically induced pain [34], [54], [55].”
From What are you feeling? Using functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess the modulation of sensory and affective responses during empathy for pain (2007) · cites this paper as [55]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 74 · Cited by 469
- Authors
- Porro, C. A., Baraldi, P., Pagnoni, G., Serafini, M., Facchin, P., Maieron, M., & Nichelli, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Udine (IT)
- Azienda Unita' Sanitaria Locale Di Modena (IT)
- University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2002-04-15
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3206-3214
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6757517
- OpenAlex
- W1775562370
- Cited by
- 469
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 12.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Keywords
- pain anticipation, primary somatosensory cortex, anterior insula, medial prefrontal cortex, top-down modulation, cognitive factors in pain, noxious stimulation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Arousal, Ascorbic Acid, Attention, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Cognition, Cues, Female, Foot, Heart Rate, Humans, Injections, Subcutaneous, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Pain, Pain Measurement, Physical Stimulation, Skin, Skin Physiological Phenomena, Stimulation, Chemical, Intuition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review