Cholinergic Changes in the APP23 Transgenic Mouse Model of Cerebral Amyloidosis
Open accessAbstract
Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder that is characterized by extracellular deposits of amyloid-beta peptide (Abeta) and a severe depletion of the cholinergic system, although the relationship between these two events is poorly understood. In the neocortex, there is a loss of cholinergic fibers and receptors and a decrease of both choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) and acetylcholinesterase enzyme activities. The nucleus basalis of Meynert (NBM), which provides the major cholinergic input to the neocortex, undergoes profound neuron loss in AD. In the present study, we have examined the cholinergic alterations in amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice (APP23), a mouse model of cerebral beta-amyloidosis. In aged APP23 mice, our results reveal modest decreases in cortical cholinergic enzyme activity compared with age-matched wild-type mice. Total cholinergic fiber length was more severely affected, with 29 and 35% decreases in the neocortex of aged APP23 mice compared with age-matched wild-type mice and young transgenic mice, respectively. However, there was no loss of cholinergic basal forebrain neurons in these aged APP23 mice, suggesting that the cortical cholinergic deficit in APP23 mice is locally induced by the deposition of amyloid and is not caused by a loss of cholinergic basal forebrain neurons. To study the impact of cholinergic basal forebrain degeneration on cortical amyloid deposition, we performed unilateral NBM lesions in adult APP23 mice. Three to 8 months after lesioning, a 38% reduction in ChAT activity and significant cholinergic fiber loss were observed in the ipsilateral frontal cortex. There was a 19% decrease in Abeta levels of the ipsilateral compared with contralateral frontal cortex with no change in the ratio of Abeta40 to Abeta42. We conclude that the severe cholinergic deficit in AD is caused by both the loss of cholinergic basal forebrain neurons and locally by cerebral amyloidosis in the neocortex. Moreover, our results suggest that disruption of the basal cholinergic forebrain system does not promote cerebral amyloidosis in APP23 transgenic mice.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In aged APP23 mice, cholinergic fiber length was significantly reduced in the neocortex, but no loss of cholinergic basal forebrain neurons was evident.
“A related observation was reported in aged APP23 mice. Although cholinergic fiber length was significantly reduced in the neocortex of aged APP23 mice, no loss of cholinergic basal forebrain neurons was evident [134]”
From Neuron Loss in Alzheimer’s Disease: Translation in Transgenic Mouse Models (2020) · cites this paper as [134]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 87 · Cited by 160
- Authors
- Boncristiano, S., Calhoun, M. E., Kelly, P. H., Pfeifer, M., Bondolfi, L., Stalder, M., Phinney, A. L., Abramowski, D., Sturchler-Pierrat, C., Enz, A., Sommer, B., Staufenbiel, M., & Jucker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Basel (CH)
- Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2002-04-15
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3234-3243
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6757538
- OpenAlex
- W1484830181
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 8.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Stiftung VERUM
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, cholinergic system, APP23 transgenic mice, cerebral amyloidosis, amyloid-beta, nucleus basalis of Meynert, choline acetyltransferase, acetylcholinesterase, neocortex, cholinergic deficit
- MeSH terms
- Acetylcholinesterase, Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Amyloid, Amyloidosis, Animals, Cell Count, Choline O-Acetyltransferase, Cholinergic Fibers, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Frontal Lobe, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Mice, Transgenic, Neurons, Prosencephalon, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Disease Progression, Neocortex, Basal Nucleus of Meynert, Cell Size, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review