The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Properties of Unitary Granule Cell→Purkinje Cell Synapses in Adult Rat Cerebellar Slices
Open accessAbstract
The cerebellar cortex contains huge numbers of synapses between granule cells and Purkinje cells. These synapses are thought to be a major storage site for information required to execute coordinated movements. To obtain a quantitative description of this connection, we recorded unitary synaptic responses between granule cell and Purkinje cell pairs in adult rat cerebellar slices. Our results are consistent with parallel fiber-->Purkinje cell synapses having high release probabilities and modest paired pulse facilitation. However, a wide range of response amplitudes was observed. Indeed, we detected many fewer parallel fiber connections (7% of the granule cells that were screened) than expected (54%), leading us to suggest that up to 85% of parallel fiber-->Purkinje cell synapses do not generate detectable electrical responses. We also investigated the possible role of granule cell ascending axons by recording granule cells near the Purkinje cell. A high proportion (up to 50%) of local granule cells generated detectable synaptic responses. However, most of these connections were indistinguishable from parallel fiber connections, suggesting that powerful ascending axon connections are rare. The existence of many very weak synapses would provide a mechanism for Purkinje cells to extract information selectively from the mass provided by parallel fibers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Marr, D. (1969) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008820 · Cited by 3,253
A theory of cerebellar function
Albus, J. S. (1971) · Mathematical Biosciences · doi:10.1016/0025-5564(71)90051-4 · Cited by 2,539
Cohen, D., & Yarom, Y. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.25.15032 · Cited by 140
Cited by
Synaptic Energy Use and Supply
Harris, J. J., Jolivet, R., & Attwell, D. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.019 · Cited by 1,747
Highly nonrandom features of synaptic connectivity in local cortical circuits
Song, S., Sjöström, P. J., Reigl, M., Nelson, S., & Chklovskii, D. B. (2005) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030068 · Cited by 1,512
Cerebellar circuitry as a neuronal machine
Ito, M. (2006) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2006.02.006 · Cited by 880
Updated Energy Budgets for Neural Computation in the Neocortex and Cerebellum
Howarth, C., Gleeson, P., & Attwell, D. (2012) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2012.35 · Cited by 738
Probabilistic brains: knowns and unknowns
Pouget, A., Beck, J. M., Ma, W. J., & Latham, P. E. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3495 · Cited by 615
“There is, however, some degree of flexibility, as synaptic boutons can grow and retract, and a large fraction of existing synapses are in fact silent (for example, up to 85% of the parallel fiber synapses are silent 77 ).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Isope, P., & Barbour, B.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2002-11-15
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 9668-9678
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2156636801
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Properties of Unitary Granule Cell→Purkinje Cell Synapses in Adult Rat Cerebellar Slices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.22-22-09668.2002
- The paper
- Isope, P., & Barbour, B. (2002). Properties of Unitary Granule Cell→Purkinje Cell Synapses in Adult Rat Cerebellar Slices. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.22-22-09668.2002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.