Optogenetic interrogation of dopaminergic modulation of the multiple phases of reward-seeking behavior
Open accessAbstract
Phasic activation of dopaminergic neurons is associated with reward-predicting cues and supports learning during behavioral adaptation. While noncontingent activation of dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental are (VTA) is sufficient for passive behavioral conditioning, it remains unknown whether the phasic dopaminergic signal is truly reinforcing. In this study, we first targeted the expression of channelrhodopsin-2 to dopaminergic neurons of the VTA and optimized optogenetically evoked dopamine transients. Second, we showed that phasic activation of dopaminergic neurons in freely moving mice causally enhances positive reinforcing actions in a food-seeking operant task. Interestingly, such effect was not found in the absence of food reward. We further found that phasic activation of dopaminergic neurons is sufficient to reactivate previously extinguished food-seeking behavior in the absence of external cues. This was also confirmed using a single-session reversal paradigm. Collectively, these data suggest that activation of dopaminergic neurons facilitates the development of positive reinforcement during reward-seeking and behavioral flexibility.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The dopamine system may be a therapeutic target for stress-induced reversal learning deficits.
“Dopamine is required for several reward-associated learning processes; therefore, the dopamine system may represent a potential point of therapeutic intervention for reversal learning deficits caused by stress (Adamantidis et al 2011, Rossi et al 2013, Schultz 2013).”
From Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease (2018) · cites this paper as Adamantidis et al 2011
Dopamine is required for several reward-associated learning processes.
“Dopamine is required for several reward-associated learning processes; therefore, the dopamine system may represent a potential point of therapeutic intervention for reversal learning deficits caused by stress (Adamantidis et al 2011, Rossi et al 2013, Schultz 2013).”
From Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease (2018) · cites this paper as Adamantidis et al 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 357
- Authors
- Adamantidis, A. R., Tsai, H.-C., Boutrel, B., Zhang, F., Stuber, G. D., Budygin, E. A., Tourino, C., Bonci, A., Deisseroth, K., & de Lecea, L.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
- Corresponding author
- Deisseroth, K.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2011-07-27
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 30
- Pages
- 10829-10835
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC3171183
- OpenAlex
- W2165706889
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 12.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- IRIS (submittedVersion)
- BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
- SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- McKnight Foundation
- National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
- Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH87592, MH83702, R01MH083702, R01MH087592)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA021880, DA21880)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- dopaminergic neurons, ventral tegmental area, phasic dopamine release, reward-seeking behavior, positive reinforcement, behavioral flexibility, extinction, reversal learning, channelrhodopsin-2, optogenetic stimulation
- MeSH terms
- Channelrhodopsins, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Bacterial Proteins, Conditioning, Operant, Discrimination, Psychological, Dopamine, Electric Stimulation, Gene Expression Regulation, Luminescent Proteins, Male, Mice, Transgenic, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Reward, Time Factors, Tyrosine 3-Monooxygenase, Ventral Tegmental Area, Mice, Electrochemical Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review