Cited by 146Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain function

The Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor 5 Subunit Plays a Key Role in Attention Circuitry and Accuracy

Open access
Bailey, C. D. C., De Biasi, M., Fletcher, P. J., Lambe, E. K.·2010·Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Stimulation of the prefrontal cortex by acetylcholine is critical for attention; however, the cellular mechanisms underlying its influence on attention pathways within the brain are not well understood. Pyramidal neurons in layer VI of the prefrontal cortex are believed to play an important role in this process because they are excited by acetylcholine and provide a major source of feedback projections to the thalamus. Here, we show using whole-cell electrophysiology that the relatively rare alpha5 subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor powerfully enhances nicotinic currents in layer VI pyramidal neurons in prefrontal cortical brain slices from adult mice. In addition, behavioral experiments using the five-choice serial reaction time test show that the presence of the nicotinic receptor alpha5 subunit also increases the accuracy of adult mice on this visual attention task under highly demanding conditions. Together, these findings demonstrate a novel and important role for the nicotinic receptor alpha5 subunit in adult brain circuitry required for attentional performance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2258-10.2010

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • nAChRs on glutamatergic thalamocortical neurons impinging on layer 5 pyramidal neurons in the prefrontal cortex are an important site for nAChR control of attention.

    “Studies in rodents have also implicated nAChRs on glutamatergic thalamocortical neurons impinging on layer 5 pyramidal neurons in the prefrontal cortex as an important site for nAChR control of attention (Lambe et al. 2005;Bailey et al. 2010).”

    From Mechanisms of Nicotine Addiction (2021) · cites this paper as Bailey et al. 2010

    The Introduction and Discussion support a role for prefrontal nAChRs in attention. But this paper identifies nAChRs on layer VI pyramidal neurons that project from cortex to thalamus; it does not establish the claimed site on thalamocortical neurons impinging on layer 5 pyramidal neurons. No page numbers were provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Inclusion of α5 into α4β2* nAChRs decreases the extent of desensitization.

    “For example, inclusion of the α5 subunit into α4β2* nAChRs decreases the extent of desensitization (Bailey et al. 2010).”

    From Nicotine Withdrawal (2015) · cites this paper as Bailey et al. 2010

    The Results section ('The α5 nicotinic subunit protects against desensitization') reports about half as much nicotine-induced desensitization in wild-type mouse layer VI neurons as in α5−/− neurons. The claim omits that cellular and exposure context; the Discussion notes that earlier work in reduced preparations found the opposite effect. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 80 · Cited by 146

Authors
Bailey, C. D. C., De Biasi, M., Fletcher, P. J., & Lambe, E. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
Corresponding author
Lambe, E. K.
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2010-07-07
Volume
30
Issue
27
Pages
9241-9252
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2041556105
Cited by
146
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 13
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canada Research Chairs
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (89825_1, MOP89825, 83422_1, 89825)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA017173)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, alpha5 subunit, prefrontal cortex, acetylcholine, attention, thalamocortical feedback
MeSH terms
Acetylcholine, Analysis of Variance, Anesthetics, Local, Animals, Attention, Choice Behavior, Dihydro-beta-Erythroidine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Membrane Potentials, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Motor Activity, Nerve Net, Neuropsychological Tests, Nicotine, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Receptors, Nicotinic, Tetrodotoxin, Prefrontal Cortex, Pyramidal Cells, Mice, Knockout, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Cholinergic Agents, Nicotinic Agonists, Nicotinic Antagonists, Mice, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review