The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Redistribution of NaV1.8 in Uninjured Axons Enables Neuropathic Pain
Open accessAbstract
The underlying mechanisms of neuropathic pain are poorly understood, and existing treatments are mostly ineffective. We recently demonstrated that antisense mediated "knock-down" of the sodium channel isoform, Na(V)1.8, reverses neuropathic pain behavior after L5/L6 spinal nerve ligation (SNL), implicating a critical functional role of Na(V)1.8 in the neuropathic state. Here we have investigated mechanisms through which Na(V)1.8 contributes to the expression of experimental neuropathic pain. Na(V)1.8 does not appear to contribute to neuropathic pain through an action in injured afferents because the channel is functionally downregulated in the cell bodies of injured neurons and does not redistribute to injured terminals. Although there was little change in Na(V)1.8 protein or functional channels in the cell bodies of uninjured neurons in L4 ganglia, there was a striking increase in Na(V)1.8 immunoreactivity along the sciatic nerve. The distribution of Na(V)1.8 reflected predominantly the presence of functional channels in unmyelinated axons. The C-fiber component of the sciatic nerve compound action potential (CAP) was resistant (>40%) to 100 microm TTX after SNL, whereas both A- and C-fiber components of sciatic nerve CAP were blocked (>90%) by 100 microm TTX in sham-operated rats or the contralateral sciatic nerve of SNL rats. Attenuating expression of Na(V)1.8 with antisense oligodeoxynucleotides prevented the redistribution of Na(V)1.8 in the sciatic nerve and reversed neuropathic pain. These observations suggest that aberrant activity in uninjured C-fibers is a necessary component of pain associated with partial nerve injury. They also suggest that blocking Na(V)1.8 would be an effective treatment of neuropathic pain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ho Kim, S., & Mo Chung, J. (1992) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(92)90041-9 · Cited by 3,069
Cited by
Persistent postsurgical pain: risk factors and prevention
Kehlet, H., Jensen, T. S., & Woolf, C. J. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68700-x · Cited by 4,086
Neuropathic Pain: A Maladaptive Response of the Nervous System to Damage
Costigan, M., Scholz, J., & Woolf, C. J. (2009) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135531 · Cited by 2,025
The Role of Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels in Pain Signaling
Bennett, D. L., Clark, A. J., Huang, J., Waxman, S. G., & Dib-Hajj, S. D. (2019) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00052.2017 · Cited by 730
Topical Amitriptyline Versus Lidocaine in the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain
Ho, K.-Y., Huh, B. K., White, W. D., Yeh, C.-C., & Miller, E. J. (2008) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0b013e318156db26 · Cited by 93
Ambroxol for neuropathic pain: hiding in plain sight?
Russo, M. A., Baron, R., Dickenson, A. H., Kern, K.-U., & Santarelli, D. M. (2023) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002693 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Gold, M. S., Weinreich, D., Kim, C.-S., Wang, R., Treanor, J., Porreca, F., & Lai, J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2003-01-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 158-166
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2076923772
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Redistribution of NaV1.8 in Uninjured Axons Enables Neuropathic Pain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.23-01-00158.2003
- The paper
- Gold, M. S., Weinreich, D., Kim, C.-S., Wang, R., Treanor, J., Porreca, F., & Lai, J. (2003). Redistribution of NaV1.8 in Uninjured Axons Enables Neuropathic Pain. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.23-01-00158.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.