The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Associative Memory Formation Increases the Observation of Dendritic Spines in the Hippocampus
Open accessAbstract
Dendritic spines are sources of synaptic contact that can be altered by experience and, as such, may be involved in memories for that experience. Here we tested whether the acquisition of new memories is associated with changes in the density of dendritic spines. Adult male rats were trained using the trace eyeblink conditioning paradigm, an associative learning task that requires the hippocampus for acquisition. Additional groups were exposed to the same number of stimuli presented in an explicitly unpaired manner or were naive. Twenty-four hours later, the density of dendritic spines was measured using Golgi impregnation. Trace conditioning was associated with an increase in the density of dendritic spines on the pyramidal cells of area CA1 of the hippocampus, an effect that was prevented by blocking acquisition of the learned response with a competitive NMDA receptor antagonist. Training with delay conditioning, a similar task that does not require the hippocampus, also produced an increase in spine density. The learning-induced increase in dendritic spine density was specific to basal dendrites of pyramidal cells in the CA1 region of the hippocampus. Changes did not occur on their apical dendrites or on cells in the dentate gyrus or somatosensory cortex. These results suggest that the formation and expression of associative memories increase the availability of dendritic spines and the potential for synaptic contact.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hippocampal synaptic enhancement and information storage within a distributed memory system
McNaughton, B. L., & Morris, R. G. M. (1987) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(87)90011-7 · Cited by 1,304
Classical conditioning and brain systems: the role of awareness
Clark, R. E., & Squire, L. R. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5360.77 · Cited by 1,138
Solomon, P. R., Vander Schaaf, E. R., Thompson, R. F., & Weisz, D. J. (1986) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.100.5.729 · Cited by 724
Cited by
Structural plasticity associated with exposure to drugs of abuse
Robinson, T. E., & Kolb, B. (2004) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2004.06.025 · Cited by 1,113
Structural plasticity and memory
Lamprecht, R., & LeDoux, J. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1301 · Cited by 1,010
Raber, J., Rola, R., LeFevour, A., Morhardt, D., Curley, J., Mizumatsu, S., VandenBerg, S. R., & Fike, J. R. (2004) · Radiation Research · doi:10.1667/rr3206 · Cited by 708
Stress duration modulates the spatiotemporal patterns of spine formation in the basolateral amygdala
Mitra, R., Jadhav, S., McEwen, B. S., Vyas, A., & Chattarji, S. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0504011102 · Cited by 663
Dendritic spines and long-term plasticity
Segal, M. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1649 · Cited by 489
Metadata
- Authors
- Leuner, B., Falduto, J., & Shors, T. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2003-01-15
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 659-665
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2145643383
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Associative Memory Formation Increases the Observation of Dendritic Spines in the Hippocampus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.23-02-00659.2003
- The paper
- Leuner, B., Falduto, J., & Shors, T. J. (2003). Associative Memory Formation Increases the Observation of Dendritic Spines in the Hippocampus. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.23-02-00659.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.