Cited by 232Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Intracranially Administered Anti-Αβ Antibodies Reduce β-Amyloid Deposition by Mechanisms Both Independent of and Associated with Microglial Activation

Open access
Wilcock, Donna M., DiCarlo, Giovanni, Henderson, Debbi, Jackson, Jennifer, Clarke, Keisha, Ugen, Kenneth E., Gordon, Marcia N., Morgan, Dave·2003·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Active immunization against the β-amyloid peptide (Αβ) with vaccines or passive immunization with systemic monoclonal anti-Aβ antibodies reduces amyloid deposition and improves cognition in APP transgenic mice. In this report, intracranial administration of anti-Αβ antibodies into frontal cortex and hippocampus of Tg2576 transgenic APP mice is described. The antibody injection resulted initially in a broad distribution of staining for the antibody, which diminished over 7 d. Although no loss of immunostaining for deposited Aβ was apparent at 4 hr, a dramatic reduction in the Αβ load was discernible at 24 hr and was maintained at 3 and 7 d. A reduction in the thioflavine-S-positive compact plaque load was delayed until 3 d, at which time microglial activation also became apparent. At 1 week after the injection, microglial activation returned to control levels, whereas Αβ and thioflavine-S staining remained reduced. The results from this study suggest a two-phase mechanism of anti-Αβ antibody action. The first phase occurs between 4 and 24 hr, clears primarily diffuse Αβ deposits, and is not associated with observable microglial activation. The second phase occurs between 1 and 3 d, is responsible for clearance of compact amyloid deposits, and is associated with microglial activation. The results are discussed in the context of other studies identifying coincident microglial activation and amyloid removal in APP transgenic animals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.23-09-03745.2003

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Short-term Aβ antibody administration with certain anti-Aβ antibodies increases reactive microglia whereas long-term administration decreases reactive microglia.

    “This time-dependent change in microglial activation agrees with the pattern observed with A␤ passive immunization, in which short-term A␤ antibody administration with certain anti-A␤ antibodies increases reactive microglia whereas long-term administration decreases reactive microglia (Wilcock et al., 2003;Wilcock et al., 2004b).”

    From Anti-ApoE Antibody Given after Plaque Onset Decreases Aβ Accumulation and Improves Brain Function in a Mouse Model of Aβ Amyloidosis (2014) · cites this paper as Wilcock et al., 2003

    The Results report increased microglial activation 72 hours after anti-Aβ antibody injection, while the Abstract says activation returned to control levels at one week. This supports a rise followed by a decline, but the study followed a single intracranial injection rather than comparing short-term with long-term antibody administration; it also found no observable activation at the earlier 24-hour time point. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 11 · Cited by 232

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Janus C, Pearson J, McLaurin J, Mathews PM, Jiang Y, Schmidt SD, Chishti MA, Horne P, Heslin D, French J, Mount HT, Nixon RA, Mercken M, Bergeron C, Fraser PE, George-Hyslop P, Westaway D (2000) A beta peptide immunization reduces behavioural impairment and plaques in a model of Alzheimer's disease. Nature 408:979 -982.

Authors
Wilcock, D. M., DiCarlo, G., Henderson, D., Jackson, J., Clarke, K., Ugen, K. E., Gordon, M. N., & Morgan, D.
Affiliations
University of South Florida (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2003-05-01
Volume
23
Issue
9
Pages
3745-3751
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W4297888792
Cited by
232
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
10.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (AG15490)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG018478, AG 15490, R01AG020227, AG20227, R01AG015490, AG18478)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
anti-amyloid antibodies, amyloid-beta deposition, microglial activation, amyloid plaque clearance, Tg2576 mice, APP transgenic mice, Alzheimer's disease, passive immunotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review