Cited by 89Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Functional Connectivity of the Medial Temporal Lobe Relates to Learning and Awareness

Open access
McIntosh, Anthony Randal, Rajah, M. Natasha, Lobaugh, Nancy J.·2003·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Learning with awareness is believed to require the involvement of the medial temporal lobe (MTL). In this study, the hypothesis tested was that this involvement is best appreciated by the pattern of MTL functional connectivity with other brain areas. In a sensory learning paradigm, human subjects were classified as AWARE or UNAWARE, on the basis of whether they noted that one of two tones predicted a visual event. Only AWARE subjects acquired and reversed a differential response to the tones. However, learned facilitation was evident in both groups. MTL activity, indexed by blood flow changes measured with positron emission tomography, was correlated with facilitation in both groups but in opposite directions (greater MTL activity was related to less facilitation in AWARE subjects but more facilitation in UNAWARE subjects). Discrimination and reversal in AWARE subjects involved anterior medial, inferior prefrontal, and lateral occipital cortices. Furthermore, unique regional patterns of MTL functional connectivity were observed: AWARE subjects engaged dorsolateral prefrontal and lateral occipital cortices, whereas UNAWARE subjects showed a more spatially restricted network involving contralateral MTL regions and the thalamus. In the AWARE group, the MTL functional connectivity pattern overlapped with regions associated with facilitation and discrimination, but in UNAWARE subjects, the MTL pattern was related only to facilitation. These results suggest that the MTL and functional connected regions, including dorsolateral and medial prefrontal cortex, acted to link facilitation and discrimination patterns in AWARE subjects. Thus, the contribution of the MTL to learning and awareness is shaped by the pattern of interregional interactions, the neural context.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.23-16-06520.2003

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Insight and the emergence of explicit knowledge in the waking brain involve activity in prefrontal cortical areas in connection with hippocampal and closely connected medial temporal lobe areas.

    “Insight and the emergence of explicit knowledge in the waking brain involve activity in prefrontal cortical areas in connection with hippocampal and closely connected medial temporal lobe areas (McIntosh et al. 1999; Luo and Niki 2003; McIntosh et al. 2003; Jung-Beeman et al. 2004; Rose et al. 2010).”

    From System consolidation of memory during sleep (2012) · cites this paper as McIntosh et al. 2003

    The Medial temporal lobe functional connectivity section (page unavailable) reports prefrontal–medial temporal connectivity in participants aware of learned stimulus relationships, describing it as a possible substrate for their learning. This supports the claim about awareness and explicit knowledge, but the paper does not examine insight, and its proposed role for that connectivity is more tentative than the citing sentence suggests. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 89

Authors
McIntosh, A. R., Rajah, M. N., & Lobaugh, N. J.
Affiliations
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2003-07-23
Volume
23
Issue
16
Pages
6520-6528
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2160115430
Cited by
89
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
medial temporal lobe, functional connectivity, sensory learning, discrimination learning, reversal learning, prefrontal cortex, occipital cortex, thalamus, artificial neural networks, interregional interaction
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Association Learning, Awareness, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Learning, Male, Nerve Net, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Reference Values, Temporal Lobe, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review