Coding of Predicted Reward Omission by Dopamine Neurons in a Conditioned Inhibition Paradigm
Open accessAbstract
Animals learn not only about stimuli that predict reward but also about those that signal the omission of an expected reward. We used a conditioned inhibition paradigm derived from animal learning theory to train a discrimination between a visual stimulus that predicted reward (conditioned excitor) and a second stimulus that predicted the omission of reward (conditioned inhibitor). Performing the discrimination required attention to both the conditioned excitor and the inhibitor; however, dopamine neurons showed very different responses to the two classes of stimuli. Conditioned inhibitors elicited considerable depressions in 48 of 69 neurons (median of 35% below baseline) and minor activations in 29 of 69 neurons (69% above baseline), whereas reward-predicting excitors induced pure activations in all 69 neurons tested (242% above baseline), thereby demonstrating that the neurons discriminated between conditioned stimuli predicting reward versus nonreward. The discriminative responses to stimuli with differential reward-predicting but common attentional functions indicate differential neural coding of reward prediction and attention. The neuronal responses appear to reflect reward prediction errors, thus suggesting an extension of the correspondence between learning theory and activity of single dopamine neurons to the prediction of nonreward.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The physical resemblance of a stimulus to other stimuli known to be associated with a reward can enhance the initial dopamine activation through generalization.
“The physical resemblance of a stimulus to other stimuli known to be associated with a reward can enhance the initial dopamine activation through generalization5,6,17,19,60.”
From Dopamine reward prediction-error signalling: A two-component response (2016) · cites this paper as [6]
Increasing the probability that the animal will receive a reward in a given experiment increases the incidence of dopamine activations to unrewarded stimuli.
“Similarly, increasing the probability that the animal will receive a reward in a given experiment constitutes a more rewarded context and increases the incidence of dopamine activations to unrewarded stimuli5,6,34.”
From Dopamine reward prediction-error signalling: A two-component response (2016) · cites this paper as [6]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 300
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Pavlov IP (1927) Conditional reflexes. London: Oxford UP.
- Authors
- Tobler, P. N., Dickinson, A., & Schultz, W.
- Affiliations
- University of Fribourg (CH)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2003-11-12
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 32
- Pages
- 10402-10410
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6741002
- OpenAlex
- W2105454649
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 3.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- James S. McDonnell Foundation
- Wellcome Trust (095495)
- European Commission
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
- Cambridge Overseas Trust
- Janggen-Pöhn-Stiftung
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- dopaminergic neurons, reward omission, conditioned inhibition, reward prediction, attention, single-unit recording, reward prediction error, learning theory, neural coding
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Attention, Behavior, Animal, Conditioning, Classical, Discrimination Learning, Dopamine, Extinction, Psychological, Female, Macaca fascicularis, Neural Inhibition, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Reward
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review