Cited by 324Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural dynamics and brain function

Temporal Filtering of Reward Signals in the Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex during a Mixed-Strategy Game

Open access
Seo, Hyojung, Lee, Daeyeol·2007·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The process of decision making in humans and other animals is adaptive and can be tuned through experience so as to optimize the outcomes of their choices in a dynamic environment. Previous studies have demonstrated that the anterior cingulate cortex plays an important role in updating the animal's behavioral strategies when the action outcome contingencies change. Moreover, neurons in the anterior cingulate cortex often encode the signals related to expected or actual reward. We investigated whether reward-related activity in the anterior cingulate cortex is affected by the animal's previous reward history. This was tested in rhesus monkeys trained to make binary choices in a computer-simulated competitive zero-sum game. The animal's choice behavior was relatively close to the optimal strategy but also revealed small systematic biases that are consistent with the use of a reinforcement learning algorithm. In addition, the activity of neurons in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex that was related to the reward received by the animal in a given trial often was modulated by the rewards in the previous trials. Some of these neurons encoded the rate of rewards in previous trials, whereas others displayed activity modulations more closely related to the reward prediction errors. In contrast, signals related to the animal's choices were represented only weakly in this cortical area. These results suggest that neurons in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex might be involved in the subjective evaluation of choice outcomes based on the animal's reward history.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2369-07.2007

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neural activity in all three cortical areas carries the information of past reward events.

    “Neural activity in all three cortical areas carries the information of past reward events19-22.”
  • In the matching pennies task, the animals made their decisions largely on the basis of their reward history.

    “Although the global optimal strategy for the matching pennies task is to choose randomly and therefore does not require memory, the animals made their decisions largely on the basis of their reward history11,19-22.”
  • Recent studies have placed more emphasis on anterior cingulate cortex's role in representing both positive and negative values.

    “recent studies have placed more emphasis on its role in representing both positive and negative values19,37.”
  • Although the overall performance of monkeys was nearly optimal, their trial-by-trial decisions, locally in time, were influenced by previous rewards and actions.

    “Although the overall performance of monkeys was nearly optimal, their trial-by-trial decisions, locally in time, were influenced by previous rewards and actions11,19-22.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 324

Authors
Seo, H., & Lee, D.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2007-08-01
Volume
27
Issue
31
Pages
8366-8377
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2032415515
Cited by
324
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 21
FWCI
10.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH073246, R01MH073246)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, reward signals, temporal filtering, mixed strategy game, zero-sum games, reinforcement learning, reward prediction error, reward history, decision-making, rhesus monkeys, choice behavior
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Choice Behavior, Gyrus Cinguli, Learning, Macaca mulatta, Male, Psychomotor Performance, Reinforcement Schedule, Reward

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review