Temporal Filtering of Reward Signals in the Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex during a Mixed-Strategy Game
Open accessAbstract
The process of decision making in humans and other animals is adaptive and can be tuned through experience so as to optimize the outcomes of their choices in a dynamic environment. Previous studies have demonstrated that the anterior cingulate cortex plays an important role in updating the animal's behavioral strategies when the action outcome contingencies change. Moreover, neurons in the anterior cingulate cortex often encode the signals related to expected or actual reward. We investigated whether reward-related activity in the anterior cingulate cortex is affected by the animal's previous reward history. This was tested in rhesus monkeys trained to make binary choices in a computer-simulated competitive zero-sum game. The animal's choice behavior was relatively close to the optimal strategy but also revealed small systematic biases that are consistent with the use of a reinforcement learning algorithm. In addition, the activity of neurons in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex that was related to the reward received by the animal in a given trial often was modulated by the rewards in the previous trials. Some of these neurons encoded the rate of rewards in previous trials, whereas others displayed activity modulations more closely related to the reward prediction errors. In contrast, signals related to the animal's choices were represented only weakly in this cortical area. These results suggest that neurons in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex might be involved in the subjective evaluation of choice outcomes based on the animal's reward history.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Neural activity in all three cortical areas carries the information of past reward events.
“Neural activity in all three cortical areas carries the information of past reward events19-22.”
From A reservoir of time constants for memory traces in cortical neurons (2011) · cites this paper as [19]
In the matching pennies task, the animals made their decisions largely on the basis of their reward history.
“Although the global optimal strategy for the matching pennies task is to choose randomly and therefore does not require memory, the animals made their decisions largely on the basis of their reward history11,19-22.”
From A reservoir of time constants for memory traces in cortical neurons (2011) · cites this paper as [19]
Recent studies have placed more emphasis on anterior cingulate cortex's role in representing both positive and negative values.
“recent studies have placed more emphasis on its role in representing both positive and negative values19,37.”
From A reservoir of time constants for memory traces in cortical neurons (2011) · cites this paper as [19]
Although the overall performance of monkeys was nearly optimal, their trial-by-trial decisions, locally in time, were influenced by previous rewards and actions.
“Although the overall performance of monkeys was nearly optimal, their trial-by-trial decisions, locally in time, were influenced by previous rewards and actions11,19-22.”
From A reservoir of time constants for memory traces in cortical neurons (2011) · cites this paper as [19]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 60 · Cited by 324
- Authors
- Seo, H., & Lee, D.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2007-08-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 31
- Pages
- 8366-8377
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC2413179
- OpenAlex
- W2032415515
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 60
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 10.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH073246, R01MH073246)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, reward signals, temporal filtering, mixed strategy game, zero-sum games, reinforcement learning, reward prediction error, reward history, decision-making, rhesus monkeys, choice behavior
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Animals, Choice Behavior, Gyrus Cinguli, Learning, Macaca mulatta, Male, Psychomotor Performance, Reinforcement Schedule, Reward
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review