The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Caenorhabditis elegans VEM-1, a Novel Membrane Protein, Regulates the Guidance of Ventral Nerve Cord-Associated Axons
Abstract
In the developing CNS, pathfinding growth cones use intermediate target- and pioneer axon-associated guidance cues to navigate along stereotypical trajectories. We previously showed that the novel membrane-associated protein Vema is localized to the floor plate and the optic chiasm, intermediate targets located at the ventral midline of the spinal cord and diencephalon in the developing rodent CNS, respectively. Here, we report that the Caenorhabditis elegans ortholog of vema, vem-1, is expressed by the AVG pioneer midline neuron and by several neurons that extend longitudinally projecting axons into the ventral nerve cord (VNC). In vem-1 mutants and vem-1 (RNAi)animals, a subset of posteriorly projecting interneuron axons either fail to extend ventrally to the VNC and, instead, assume aberrant lateral positions or are inappropriately located in the left tract of the VNC. In addition, ventral motor neuron axons exhibit pathfinding errors within the VNC and along the dorsoventral body axis. The conserved UNC-40/DCC and SAX-3-/Robo receptors mediate signaling events that regulate axon guidance in a wide variety of systems. Double-mutant analyses reveal that vem-1 genetically interacts with unc-40 and is likely to function in parallel with sax-3 to regulate the guidance of a subset of VNC-associated interneuron and motor neuron axons. Consistent with these genetic data, we also show that VEM-1 is capable of physically interacting with UNC-40 but not SAX-3.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PGRMC1 has a role in positioning netrin receptors in the cell membrane to mediate axon guidance.
“Mechanistically, PGRMC1 has a role in positioning netrin receptors in the cell membrane to mediate axon guidance [11,105,106].”
From Sigma-2 Receptors—From Basic Biology to Therapeutic Target: A Focus on Age-Related Degenerative Diseases (2023) · cites this paper as [106]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans
White, J. G., Southgate, E., Thomson, J. N., & Brenner, S. (1986) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1986.0056 · Cited by 5,589 · cited 2×
“After reaching the dorsal midline, all of these axons bifurcate again to extend both anteriorly and posteriorly directed projections along the DNC (White et al., 1986).”
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 72
- 2001, Development, 128, 1951, 10.1242/dev.128.11.1951 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1066642 · DOI
- 10.1051/medsci/20031967725 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00246-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81337-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0959-4388(99)00021-5 · DOI
- 10.1242/dev.00571 · DOI
- 10.1006/dbio.1997.8790 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.281.5377.706 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0955-0674(98)80036-7 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1072165 · DOI
- Durbin RM (1987) Studies on the development and organization of the nervous system of Caenorhabditis elegans. PhD thesis, Cambridge University.
- 10.1038/35888 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81131-9 · DOI
- 2002, Development, 129, 2947, 10.1242/dev.129.12.2947 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0925-4773(03)00179-5 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/22.9.1762 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0959-4388(02)00323-9 · DOI
- 1992, EMBO J, 11, 2885, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05357.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00448-2 · DOI
- 10.1038/378082a0 · DOI
- 1990, Neuron, 2, 61
- 10.1016/0076-6879(90)83041-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0959-4388(03)00020-5 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.144.1.45 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00672-4 · DOI
- 10.1242/dev.00518 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00325-0 · DOI
- 10.1242/dev.00727 · DOI
- 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90240-E · DOI
- 10.1038/ng0997-119 · DOI
- 1999, J Neurosci, 19, 539, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-02-00539.1999 · DOI
- 1995, J Neurosci, 15, 562, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-01-00562.1995 · DOI
- 10.1002/dvdy.1143 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00901-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80431-6 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.288.5463.150 · DOI
- 2001, Development, 128, 4079, 10.1242/dev.128.20.4079 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90357-I · DOI
- 1999, J Neurosci, 19, 7048, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-16-07048.1999 · DOI
- 1995, Genetics, 141, 977, 10.1093/genetics/141.3.977 · DOI
- 10.1038/378078a0 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0962-8924(96)10057-X · DOI
- 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90297-Q · DOI
- Mello CC, Fire A (1995) DNA Transformation. In: Caenorhabditis elegans: modern biological analysis of an organism (Epstein HF, Shakes DC, eds), pp 451-482. San Diego: Academic. · DOI
- 1995, Development, 121, 2877, 10.1242/dev.121.9.2877 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0168-9525(98)01510-8 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.95.26.15502 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00795-X · DOI
- 10.1038/35084096 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(199904)39:1<107::AID-NEU9>3.0.CO;2-7 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.273.5279.1227 · DOI
- 10.1002/cne.10356 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/mcne.1999.0794 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1058445 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/72850 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80070-7 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.274.5290.1123 · DOI
- 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90162-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0012-1606(03)00447-0 · DOI
- 10.1242/dev.00570 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0166-2236(02)02206-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80021-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80220-8 · DOI
- 1976, Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 275, 327, 10.1098/rstb.1976.0086 · DOI · Paper page
- 1997, Development, 124, 2571, 10.1242/dev.124.13.2571 · DOI
- 1998, Development, 125, 3853, 10.1242/dev.125.19.3853 · DOI
- 2001, Nat Neurosci, 4, 1169
- 10.1038/nn956 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80916-2 · DOI
- 1999, Development, 126, 3679, 10.1242/dev.126.16.3679 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0177(199804)211:4<314::AID-AJA3>3.0.CO;2-K · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lizama, B. N., Kahle, J., Catalano, S. M., Caggiano, A. O., Grundman, M., & Hamby, M. E. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24076251 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Runko, E., & Kaprielian, Z.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2004-10-13
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 41
- Pages
- 9015-9026
- ISSN
- 0270-6474
- 1529-2401
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review