In Vivo Microdialysis Reveals Age-Dependent Decrease of Brain Interstitial Fluid Tau Levels in P301S Human Tau Transgenic Mice
Open accessAbstract
Although tau is a cytoplasmic protein, it is also found in brain extracellular fluids, e.g., CSF. Recent findings suggest that aggregated tau can be transferred between cells and extracellular tau aggregates might mediate spread of tau pathology. Despite these data, details of whether tau is normally released into the brain interstitial fluid (ISF), its concentration in ISF in relation to CSF, and whether ISF tau is influenced by its aggregation are unknown. To address these issues, we developed a microdialysis technique to analyze monomeric ISF tau levels within the hippocampus of awake, freely moving mice. We detected tau in ISF of wild-type mice, suggesting that tau is released in the absence of neurodegeneration. ISF tau was significantly higher than CSF tau and their concentrations were not significantly correlated. Using P301S human tau transgenic mice (P301S tg mice), we found that ISF tau is fivefold higher than endogenous murine tau, consistent with its elevated levels of expression. However, following the onset of tau aggregation, monomeric ISF tau decreased markedly. Biochemical analysis demonstrated that soluble tau in brain homogenates decreased along with the deposition of insoluble tau. Tau fibrils injected into the hippocampus decreased ISF tau, suggesting that extracellular tau is in equilibrium with extracellular or intracellular tau aggregates. This technique should facilitate further studies of tau secretion, spread of tau pathology, the effects of different disease states on ISF tau, and the efficacy of experimental treatments.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
One possible explanation is that the large rise in aggregated tau sequesters phosphorylated tau in the brain, lowering CSF levels.
“One possible explanation for this is similar to what has been observed with soluble/aggregated Aβ52: that the dramatic increase of aggregated tau sequesters phosphorylated tau53 in the brain, decreasing CSF levels.”
From A soluble phosphorylated tau signature links tau, amyloid and the evolution of stages of dominantly inherited Alzheimer’s disease (2020) · cites this paper as [53]
Tau is primarily an intracellular neuronal protein, but is normally secreted into the interstitial fluid and is believed to transmit tau pathology in a prion-like manner.
“In the brain, tau is primarily an intracellular neuronal protein, but is normally secreted into the interstitial fluid (ISF)53 and is believed to transmit tau pathology in a prion-like manner54.”
From Interplay between innate immunity and Alzheimer disease: APOE and TREM2 in the spotlight (2018) · cites this paper as [53]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 351
- Authors
- Yamada, K., Cirrito, J. R., Stewart, F. R., Jiang, H., Finn, M. B., Holmes, B. B., Binder, L. I., Mandelkow, E.-M., Diamond, M. I., Lee, V. M.-Y., & Holtzman, D. M.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2011-09-14
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 37
- Pages
- 13110-13117
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC4299126
- OpenAlex
- W2033349504
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 15.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- AstraZeneca
- Cure Alzheimer's Fund
- Astellas Pharma
- Astellas Foundation for Research on Metabolic Disorders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
- National Institute on Aging (P30AG010124, P01AG017586)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Keywords
- tau protein, brain interstitial fluid, cerebrospinal fluid, P301S tau transgenic mice, tau aggregation, tau secretion, hippocampus, age-related changes, tau fibrils, tauopathy
- MeSH terms
- Aging, Animals, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Male, Mice, Transgenic, Models, Neurological, Solubility, tau Proteins, Microdialysis, Extracellular Fluid, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review