Cited by 143Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Genome-wide association studies of impulsive personality traits (BIS-11 and UPPSP) and drug experimentation in up to 22,861 adult research participants identify loci in the CACNA1I and CADM2 genes

Open access
Sanchez-Roige, Sandra, Fontanillas, Pierre, Elson, Sarah L., Gray, Joshua C., de Wit, Harriet, MacKillop, James, Palmer, Abraham A.·2019·The Journal of Neuroscience

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Background Impulsive personality traits are complex heritable traits that are governed by frontal-subcortical circuits and are associated with numerous neuropsychiatric disorders, particularly drug abuse. Methods In collaboration with the genetics company 23andMe, Inc., we performed several genome-wide association studies ( GWAS ) on measures of impulsive personality traits (the short version of the UPPSP Impulsive Behavior Scale, and the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale [BIS-11]) and drug experimentation (the number of drug classes an individual has tried in their lifetime) in up to 22,861 male and female adult research participants of European ancestry. Results Impulsive personality traits and drug experimentation showed SNP-heritabilities that ranged from 5 to 11%. Genetic variants in the CADM2 locus were significantly associated with the UPPSP Sensation Seeking subscale ( P = 8.3 × 10 -9 , rs139528938) and showed a suggestive association with drug experimentation ( P = 3.0 × 10 -7 , rs2163971; r 2 = 0.68 with rs139528938); CADM2 has been previously associated with measures of risky behaviors and self-reported risk tolerance, cannabis initiation, alcohol consumption, as well as information speed processing, body mass index (BMI) variation and obesity. Furthermore, genetic variants in the CACNA1I locus were significantly associated with the UPPSP Negative Urgency subscale ( P = 3.8 × 10 -8 , rs199694726). Multiple subscales from both UPPSP and BIS showed strong genetic correlations (>0.5) with drug experimentation and other substance use traits measured in independent cohorts, including smoking initiation, and lifetime cannabis use. Several UPPSP and BIS subscales were genetically correlated with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (r g = 0.30-0.51, p < 8.69 x 10 -3 ), supporting their validity as endophenotypes. Conclusions Our findings demonstrate a role for common genetic contributions to individual differences in impulsivity. Furthermore, our study is the first to provide a genetic dissection of the relationship between different types of impulsive personality traits and various psychiatric disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2662-18.2019

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other genes among the 34, including CADM2, ZIC4, GABRA2, NEGR1, and FURIN, have previously been identified in GWAS of behavioral or psychiatric traits.

    “Other genes among the 34 have previously been identified in GWAS of behavioral or psychiatric traits: Cell Adhesion Molecule 2 (CADM2, previously identified in GWAS related to self-regulation, including drug use and risk tolerance17,33), Zic Family Member 4 (ZIC4, associated with brain volume34), Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptor Subunit Alpha 2 (GABRA2; the site of action for alcohol and”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 89 · Cited by 143

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Durand EY, Do CB, Mountain JL, Macpherson JM (2014) Ancestry compo- sition: a novel, efficient pipeline for ancestry deconvolution. bioRxiv 010512.
  2. Linne ´r RK, Biroli P, Kong E, Meddens SF, Wedow R, Fontana MA, Lebreton M, Abdellaoui A, Hammerschlag AR, Nivard MG, Okbay A, Rietveld CA, Timshel PN, Tino SP, Trzaskowski M, de Vlaming R, Zu ¨nd CL, Bao Y, Buzdugan L, Caplin AH, et al. (2018) Genome-wide study identifies 611 loci associated with risk tolerance and risky behaviors. bioRxiv 261081.
  3. Pasman JA, Verweij KJ, Gerring Z, Stringer S, Sanchez-Roige S, Treur JL, Abdellaoui A, Nivard MG, Baselmans BM, Ong JS, Ip HF, van der Zee MD, Bartels M, Day FR, Fontanillas P, Elson SL, 23andMe Research Team, de Wit H, Davis LK, MacKillop J, et al. (2018) Genome-wide association analysis of lifetime cannabis use (N ϭ 184,765) identifies new risk loci, genetic overlap with mental health, and a causal influence of schizophrenia on cannabis use. bioRxiv. Advance online publication. Re- trieved from January 8, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1101/234294. · DOI
  4. Verdejo-García A, Lawrence AJ, Clark L (2008) Impulsivity as a vulnerabil- ity marker for substance-use disorders: review of findings from high-risk research, problem gamblers and genetic association studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 32:777-810.

Authors
Sanchez-Roige, S., Fontanillas, P., Elson, S. L., Gray, J. C., de Wit, H., MacKillop, J., & Palmer, A. A.
Affiliations
  • Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (US)
  • Homewood Research Institute (CA)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Palmer, Abraham A.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2019-02-04
Volume
39
Issue
13
Pages
2662-18
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2914248456
Cited by
143
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 2
FWCI
13.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R25MH081482)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA002812, P50DA037844)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Keywords
trait impulsivity, drug experimentation, CADM2, sensation seeking, negative urgency, Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, UPPS-P, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, genetic correlation, substance use, smoking initiation, cannabis use, endophenotypes, heritability, single nucleotide polymorphisms, frontal-subcortical circuits
MeSH terms
Glucagon-Like Peptide-2 Receptor, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Middle Aged, Peptides, Personality, Personality Tests, Cell Adhesion Molecules, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Calcium Channels, T-Type, White People, Drug Users, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review