Cited by 205Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Locomotion Enhances Neural Encoding of Visual Stimuli in Mouse V1

Open access
Dadarlat, Maria C., Stryker, Michael P.·2017·The Journal of Neuroscience

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Neurons in mouse primary visual cortex (V1) are selective for particular properties of visual stimuli. Locomotion causes a change in cortical state that leaves their selectivity unchanged but strengthens their responses. Both locomotion and the change in cortical state are thought to be initiated by projections from the mesencephalic locomotor region, the latter through a disinhibitory circuit in V1. By recording simultaneously from a large number of single neurons in alert mice viewing moving gratings, we investigated the relationship between locomotion and the information contained within the neural population. We found that locomotion improved encoding of visual stimuli in V1 by two mechanisms. First, locomotion-induced increases in firing rates enhanced the mutual information between visual stimuli and single neuron responses over a fixed window of time. Second, stimulus discriminability was improved, even for fixed population firing rates, because of a decrease in noise correlations across the population. These two mechanisms contributed differently to improvements in discriminability across cortical layers, with changes in firing rates most important in the upper layers and changes in noise correlations most important in layer V. Together, these changes resulted in a threefold to fivefold reduction in the time needed to precisely encode grating direction and orientation. These results support the hypothesis that cortical state shifts during locomotion to accommodate an increased load on the visual system when mice are moving. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This paper contains three novel findings about the representation of information in neurons within the primary visual cortex of the mouse. First, we show that locomotion reduces by at least a factor of 3 the time needed for information to accumulate in the visual cortex that allows the distinction of different visual stimuli. Second, we show that the effect of locomotion is to increase information in cells of all layers of the visual cortex. Third, we show that the means by which information is enhanced by locomotion differs between the upper layers, where the major effect is the increasing of firing rates, and in layer V, where the major effect is the reduction in noise correlations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2728-16.2017

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In visual cortex, the onset of arousal (as measured by pupil diameter) and locomotion increase neuronal gain.

    “In the visual cortex, the onset of arousal (as measured by pupil diameter) and locomotion increase neuronal gain32,33,36,37.”

    From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [37]

  • Decoders predicting presence of visual stimuli from neural responses are more accurate when using mouse cortex activity during locomotion than during quiescence.

    “Decoders that predict the presence of visual stimuli on the basis of neural responses are more accurate when they use neural activity recorded in the mouse cortex during locomotion than that during quiescence27,37”

    From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [37]

  • Using two separate decoders during still and active periods does not improve stimulus prediction, indicating that a model with a single mode of gain modulation best reflects improvements in encoding between the two states.

    “Using two separate decoders during still and active periods does not improve stimulus prediction, indicating that a model with a single mode of gain modulation best reflects the improvements in encoding between the two states27,37.”

    From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [37]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 205

Authors
Dadarlat, M. C., & Stryker, M. P.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2017-03-06
Volume
37
Issue
14
Pages
3764-3775
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2951631742
Cited by
205
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 3
FWCI
11.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
National Eye Institute (R01EY002874)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
locomotion, primary visual cortex, neural coding, mutual information, noise correlation, cortical state, mesencephalic locomotor region, orientation selectivity, cortical layers, population coding, mouse visual system
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Female, Locomotion, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review