Cited by 183Neuroscience and Music PerceptionHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsNeural dynamics and brain function

Stimulus-Specific Adaptation in Auditory Cortex Is an NMDA-Independent Process Distinct from the Sensory Novelty Encoded by the Mismatch Negativity

Open access
Farley, Brandon J., Quirk, Michael C., Doherty, James J., Christian, Edward P.·2010·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The significance of the mismatch negativity (MMN), an event-related potential measured in humans which indexes novelty in the auditory environment, has motivated a search for a cellular correlate of this process. A leading candidate is stimulus-specific adaptation (SSA) in auditory cortex units, which shares several characteristics with the MMN. Whether auditory cortex responses encode sensory novelty, a defining property of the MMN, however, has not been resolved. To evaluate this key issue, we used several variations of the auditory oddball paradigm from the human literature and examined psychophysical and pharmacological properties of multiunit activity in the auditory cortex of awake rodents. We found converging evidence dissociating SSA from sensory novelty and the MMN. First, during an oddball paradigm with frequency deviants, neuronal responses showed clear SSA but failed to encode novelty in a manner analogous to the human MMN. Second, oddball paradigms using intensity or duration deviants revealed a pattern of unit responses that showed sensory adaptation, but again without any measurable novelty correlates aligning to the human MMN. Finally NMDA antagonists, which are known to disrupt the MMN, suppressed the magnitude of multiunit responses in a nonspecific manner, leaving the process of SSA intact. Together, our results suggest that auditory novelty detection as indexed by the MMN is dissociable from SSA at the level of activity encoded by auditory cortex neurons. Further, the NMDA sensitivity reported for the MMN, which models the disruption of MMN observed in schizophrenia, may occur at a mechanistic locus outside of SSA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2793-10.2010

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adaptation enables high sensitivity to small changes in stimulus features over a large range of intensities and is found across sensory systems.

    “Adaptation enables high sensitivity to small changes in stimulus features over a large range of intensities, and is found across sensory systems5,17,26,105,210–216.”

    From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [211]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 183

Authors
Farley, B. J., Quirk, M. C., Doherty, J. J., & Christian, E. P.
Affiliations
  • AstraZeneca (United States) (US)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2010-12-08
Volume
30
Issue
49
Pages
16475-16484
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2145695390
Cited by
183
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 11
FWCI
8.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
stimulus-specific adaptation, auditory cortex, mismatch negativity, NMDA receptor, NMDA receptor antagonists, auditory oddball paradigm, multi-unit activity, sensory adaptation, schizophrenia, auditory deviance
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adaptation, Physiological, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Auditory Cortex, Auditory Perception, Contingent Negative Variation, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Psychoacoustics, Rodentia, Wakefulness, N-Methylaspartate, Dizocilpine Maleate, Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review