Cited by 77Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementBarrier Structure and Function Studies

Endothelial CD36 Contributes to Postischemic Brain Injury by Promoting Neutrophil Activation via CSF3

Open access
Garcia-Bonilla, Lidia, Racchumi, Gianfranco, Murphy, Michelle, Anrather, Josef, Iadecola, Costantino·2015·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The scavenger receptor CD36 is a critical factor initiating ischemic brain injury, but the cell type(s) expressing CD36 and responsible for its harmful effects remain unknown. Using bone marrow (BM) chimeras subjected to transient middle cerebral artery occlusion, we found that CD36 −/− mice transplanted with wild-type (WT) BM (WT→CD36 −/− ) have smaller infarcts (−67%), comparable with those of mice lacking CD36 both in brain and hematogenous cells (CD36 −/− →CD36 −/− ; − 72%). Conversely, WT mice receiving CD36 −/− BM (CD36 −/− →WT) have infarcts similar to WT→WT mice, suggesting that CD36 in the host brain (i.e., in microglia and endothelial cells), and not in hematogenous cells is involved in the damage. As anticipated, postischemic neutrophil infiltration in CD36 −/− →CD36 −/− mice was attenuated. Surprisingly, however, in WT→CD36 −/− mice, in which infarcts were small, neutrophil infiltration was large and similar to that of CD36 −/− →WT mice, in which infarcts were not reduced. Postischemic neutrophil free radical production was attenuated in WT→CD36 −/− mice compared with CD36 −/− →WT mice, whereas expression of the neutrophil activator colony-stimulating factor 3 (CSF3) was suppressed in CD36 −/− cerebral endothelial cells, but not microglia. In CD36 −/− cerebral endothelial cultures exposed to extracts from stroke brains, the upregulation of CSF3, but not neutrophil attractant chemokines, was suppressed. Intracerebroventricular administration of CSF3, 24 h after stroke, reconstituted neutrophil radical production and increased infarct volume in WT→CD36 −/− mice. The findings identify endothelial cells as a key player in the deleterious effects of CD36 in stroke, and unveil a novel role of endothelial CD36 in enabling neutrophil neurotoxicity through CSF3. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Ischemic stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide with limited therapeutic options. The inflammatory response initiated by cerebral ischemia-reperfusion contributes to ischemic brain injury and is a potential therapeutic target. Here we report that CD36, an innate immunity receptor involved in the initiation of postischemic inflammation, is a previously unrecognized regulator of neutrophil cytotoxicity. The effect is mediated by endothelial CD36 via upregulation of the neutrophil activator CSF3 in cerebral endothelial cells. Therefore, approaches to modulate cerebral endothelial CD36 signaling or to neutralize CSF3 may provide novel therapeutic opportunities to ameliorate postischemic inflammatory injury.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.2980-15.2015

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 77

Authors
Garcia-Bonilla, L., Racchumi, G., Murphy, M., Anrather, J., & Iadecola, C.
Affiliations
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2015-11-04
Volume
35
Issue
44
Pages
14783-14793
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2400526914
Cited by
77
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS034179, R01NS081179, NS081179, NS34179, R37NS034179)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
Keywords
CD36, scavenger receptors, brain endothelial cells, ischemic stroke, neutrophil infiltration, neutrophil activation, ischemia-reperfusion injury, infarct size, bone marrow chimeras, microglia, neuroinflammation, chemokines
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Injuries, Brain Ischemia, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Organ Culture Techniques, Receptors, Colony-Stimulating Factor, Mice, Knockout, Neutrophil Activation, CD36 Antigens, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review