The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Temporal Dynamics and Latency Patterns of Receptor Neuron Input to the Olfactory Bulb
Open accessAbstract
Odorants are first represented in the brain by distributed patterns of activity in the olfactory bulb (OB). Although neurons downstream of sensory inputs respond to odorants with temporally structured activity, sensory inputs to glomeruli are typically described as static maps. Here, we imaged the temporal dynamics of receptor neuron input to the OB with a calcium-sensitive dye in the olfactory receptor nerve terminals in anesthetized mice. We found that diverse, glomerulus- and odorant-dependent temporal dynamics are present even at this initial input stage. Instantaneous spatial patterns of receptor input to glomeruli changed both within and between respiration cycles. Glomerular odorant responses differed in amplitude, latency, rise time, and degree of modulation by sniffing in an odorant-specific manner. Pattern dynamics within the first respiration cycle recurred in a similar manner during consecutive cycles. When sniff rate was increased artificially, pattern dynamics were preserved in the first sniff but were attenuated during subsequent sniffs. Temporal response properties were consistent across individuals on a coarse regional scale and on a fine scale of individual glomeruli. Latency and magnitude of glomerular inputs were only weakly correlated and might therefore convey independent odorant information. These data demonstrate that glomerular maps of primary sensory input to the OB are temporally dynamic. These dynamics may contribute to the representation of odorant information and affect information processing in the central olfactory system of rodents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cortical processing of odor objects.
Wilson, D. A., & Sullivan, R. M. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.027 · Cited by 468
Precise olfactory responses tile the sniff cycle
Shusterman, R., Smear, M. C., Koulakov, A. A., & Rinberg, D. (2011) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2877 · Cited by 388
Dual functions of mammalian olfactory sensory neurons as odor detectors and mechanical sensors
Grosmaitre, X., Santarelli, L. C., Tan, J., Luo, M., & Ma, M. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1856 · Cited by 371
Coding and synaptic processing of sensory information in the glomerular layer of the olfactory bulb
Wachowiak, M., & Shipley, M. T. (2006) · Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2006.04.007 · Cited by 300
Self-citationSpeed-Accuracy Tradeoff in Olfaction
Rinberg, D., Koulakov, A., & Gelperin, A. (2006) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.07.013 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Spors, H., Wachowiak, M., Cohen, L. B., & Friedrich, R. W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2006-01-25
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1247-1259
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2068679600
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temporal Dynamics and Latency Patterns of Receptor Neuron Input to the Olfactory Bulb. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.3100-05.2006
- The paper
- Spors, H., Wachowiak, M., Cohen, L. B., & Friedrich, R. W. (2006). Temporal Dynamics and Latency Patterns of Receptor Neuron Input to the Olfactory Bulb. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3100-05.2006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.