Neuronal P2X7 Receptors Revisited: Do They Really Exist?
Open accessAbstract
P2X7 receptors (Rs) constitute a subclass of ATP-sensitive ionotropic receptors (P2X1-P2X7). P2X7Rs have many distinguishing features, mostly based on their long intracellular C terminus regulating trafficking to the cell membrane, protein–protein interactions, and post-translational modification. Their C-terminal tail is especially important in enabling the transition from the nonselective ion channel mode to a membrane pore allowing the passage of large molecules. There is an ongoing dispute on the existence of neuronal P2X7Rs with consequences for our knowledge on their involvement in neuroinflammation, aggravating stroke, temporal lobe epilepsy, neuropathic pain, and various neurodegenerative diseases. Whereas early results appeared to support the operation of P2X7Rs at neurons, more recently glial P2X7Rs are increasingly considered as indirect causes of neuronal effects. Specific tools for P2X7Rs are of limited value because of the poor selectivity of agonists, and the inherent failure of antibodies to differentiate between the large number of active and inactive splice variants, or gain-of-function and loss-of-function small nucleotide polymorphisms of the receptor. Unfortunately, the available P2RX7 knock-out mice generated by pharmaceutical companies possess certain splice variants, which evade inactivation. In view of the recently discovered bidirectional dialogue between astrocytes and neurons (and even microglia and neurons), we offer an alternative explanation for previous data, which assumedly support the existence of P2X7Rs at neurons. We think that the unbiased reader will follow our argumentation on astrocytic or microglial P2X7Rs being the primary targets of pathologically high extracellular ATP concentrations, although a neuronal localization of these receptors cannot be fully excluded either.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
P2X7R and NLRP3 are heavily expressed in microglia.
“Another convergent point between purinergic signaling and the NLRP3 inflammasome is that P2X7R as well as NLRP3 are heavily expressed in microglia [47].”
From P2X7 Receptor Signaling in Stress and Depression (2019) · cites this paper as [47]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 160 · Cited by 179
- Authors
- Illes, P., Khan, T. M., & Rubini, P.
- Affiliations
- Leipzig University (DE)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2017-07-26
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 30
- Pages
- 7049-7062
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6705732
- OpenAlex
- W2739423755
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 160
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 15.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (IL 20/21-1)
- Chinesisch-Deutsche Zentrum für Wissenschaftsförderung
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- P2X7 receptor, P2X receptors, C-terminal tail, membrane pores, splice variants, astrocyte-neuron communication, neuron-microglia communication, extracellular ATP, neuroinflammation, stroke, temporal lobe epilepsy, neuropathic pain, neurodegenerative diseases, receptor agonists, immunoglobulins
- MeSH terms
- Adenosine Triphosphate, Animals, Astrocytes, Humans, Models, Neurological, Nervous System Diseases, Neurons, Evidence-Based Medicine, Receptors, Purinergic P2X7
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review