Cited by 131Memory and Neural MechanismsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Manipulating a “Cocaine Engram” in Mice

Open access
Hsiang, Hwa-Lin (Liz), Epp, Jonathan R., van den Oever, Michel C., Yan, Chen, Rashid, Asim J., Insel, Nathan, Ye, Li, Niibori, Yosuke +3 more·2014·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Experience with drugs of abuse (such as cocaine) produces powerful, long-lasting memories that may be important in the development and persistence of drug addiction. The neural mechanisms that mediate how and where these cocaine memories are encoded, consolidated and stored are unknown. Here we used conditioned place preference in mice to examine the precise neural circuits that support the memory of a cocaine-cue association (the “cocaine memory trace” or “cocaine engram”). We found that a small population of neurons (∼10%) in the lateral nucleus of amygdala (LA) were recruited at the time of cocaine-conditioning to become part of this cocaine engram. Neurons with increased levels of the transcription factor CREB were preferentially recruited or allocated to the cocaine engram. Ablating or silencing neurons overexpressing CREB (but not a similar number of random LA neurons) before testing disrupted the expression of a previously acquired cocaine memory, suggesting that neurons overexpressing CREB become a critical hub in what is likely a larger cocaine memory engram. Consistent with theories that coordinated postencoding reactivation of neurons within an engram or cell assembly is crucial for memory consolidation (Marr, 1971; Buzsáki, 1989; Wilson and McNaughton, 1994; McClelland et al., 1995; Girardeau et al., 2009; Dupret et al., 2010; Carr et al., 2011), we also found that post-training suppression, or nondiscriminate activation, of CREB overexpressing neurons impaired consolidation of the cocaine memory. These findings reveal mechanisms underlying how and where drug memories are encoded and stored in the brain and may also inform the development of treatments for drug addiction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3327-14.2014

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One study supporting the necessity of such replay found that post-training suppression of activity of neurons engineered to overexpress CREB in the amygdala blocked the consolidation of a memory of association between cocaine and a location.

    “One study supporting the necessity of such replay found that the post-training suppression of activity of neurons that were engineered to overexpress CREB in the amygdala blocked the consolidation of a memory of association between cocaine and a location110.”
  • Similar blocking effects were obtained by the indiscriminate activation of neurons that overexpressed CREB.

    “Similar blocking effects were obtained by the indiscriminate activation of neurons that overexpressed CREB.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 294 · Cited by 131

Authors
Hsiang, H.-L. (., Epp, J. R., van den Oever, M. C., Yan, C., Rashid, A. J., Insel, N., Ye, L., Niibori, Y., Deisseroth, K., Frankland, P. W., & Josselyn, S. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2014-10-15
Volume
34
Issue
42
Pages
14115-14127
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2062843325
Cited by
131
References
294
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11
FWCI
7.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • Hospital for Sick Children
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP74650, MOP- 86762)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
memory engrams, conditioned place preference, lateral amygdala, CREB, drug addiction, memory consolidation, neural circuits, cell assemblies, memory reactivation, neuronal ablation
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Cocaine, Conditioning, Psychological, Female, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Cyclic AMP Response Element-Binding Protein, Mice, Mice, 129 Strain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review