Cited by 130Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Neural correlates of instrumental contingency learning: differential effects of action-reward conjunction and disjunction

Open access
Liljeholm, Mimi, Tricomi, Elizabeth, O'Doherty, John P., Balleine, Bernard W.·2011·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Contingency theories of goal-directed action propose that experienced disjunctions between an action and its specific consequences, as well as conjunctions between these events, contribute to encoding the action-outcome association. Although considerable behavioral research in rats and humans has provided evidence for this proposal, relatively little is known about the neural processes that contribute to the two components of the contingency calculation. Specifically, while recent findings suggest that the influence of action-outcome conjunctions on goal-directed learning is mediated by a circuit involving ventromedial prefrontal, medial orbitofrontal cortex, and dorsomedial striatum, the neural processes that mediate the influence of experienced disjunctions between these events are unknown. Here we show differential responses to probabilities of conjunctive and disjunctive reward deliveries in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, the dorsomedial striatum, and the inferior frontal gyrus. Importantly, activity in the inferior parietal lobule and the left middle frontal gyrus varied with a formal integration of the two reward probabilities, ΔP, as did response rates and explicit judgments of the causal efficacy of the action.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3354-10.2011

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 130

Authors
Liljeholm, M., Tricomi, E., O'Doherty, J. P., & Balleine, B. W.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2011-02-16
Volume
31
Issue
7
Pages
2474-2480
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2069640850
Cited by
130
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (56446, MH56446, R01MH056446, R03MH075763)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
goal-directed learning, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, dorsomedial striatum, inferior frontal gyrus, inferior parietal lobule, response rate, neural correlates
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Conditioning, Operant, Female, Goals, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neural Pathways, Oxygen, Probability, Reward, Statistics as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review