The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Micromolar Zinc-Binding Domain on the NMDA Receptor Subunit NR2B
Open accessAbstract
Eukaryotic ionotropic glutamate receptor subunits possess a large N-terminal domain (NTD) distinct from the neighboring agonist-binding domain. In NMDA receptors, the NTDs of NR2A and NR2B form modulatory domains binding allosteric inhibitors. Despite a high sequence homology, these two domains have been shown to bind two ligands of strikingly different chemical nature. Whereas the NTD of NR2A binds zinc with high (nanomolar) affinity, the NTD of NR2B binds the synthetic neuroprotectant ifenprodil and its derivatives. Using both NTD-mutated/deleted receptors and isolated NTDs, we now show that the NTD of NR2B, in contrast to NR2C and NR2D, also binds zinc, but with a lower affinity. Furthermore, we present evidence that zinc and ifenprodil compete for an overlapping binding site. This modulatory binding site accounts for the submicromolar zinc inhibition of NR1/NR2B receptors. Given that zinc is accumulated and released at many glutamatergic synapses in the CNS, these findings suggest that zinc is the endogenous ligand of the NTD of both NR2A and NR2B, the two major NR2 subunits. Thus, NMDA receptors contain zinc sensors capable of detecting extracellular zinc over a wide concentration range depending on their NR2 subunit composition. The coexistence of subunit-specific zinc-binding sites of high (nanomolar) and low (micromolar) affinity on NMDA receptors raises the possibility that zinc exerts both a tonic and a phasic control of membrane excitability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Choi, Y.-B., & Lipton, S. A. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80763-1 · Cited by 180
Cited by
Glutamate Receptor Ion Channels: Structure, Regulation, and Function
Traynelis, S. F., Wollmuth, L. P., McBain, C. J., Menniti, F. S., Vance, K. M., Ogden, K. K., Hansen, K. B., Yuan, H., Myers, S. J., & Dingledine, R. (2010) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.109.002451 · Cited by 3,568
NMDA receptor subunit diversity: impact on receptor properties, synaptic plasticity and disease
Paoletti, P., Bellone, C., & Zhou, Q. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3504 · Cited by 2,523
Self-citationMetals in Neurobiology: Probing Their Chemistry and Biology with Molecular Imaging
Que, E. L., Domaille, D. W., & Chang, C. J. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr078203u · Cited by 2,061
NMDA receptor subunits: function and pharmacology
PAOLETTI, P., & NEYTON, J. (2007) · Current Opinion in Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.coph.2006.08.011 · Cited by 887
Self-citationZinc in the physiology and pathology of the CNS
Sensi, S. L., Paoletti, P., Bush, A. I., & Sekler, I. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2734 · Cited by 759
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rachline, J., Perin-Dureau, F., Le Goff, A., Neyton, J., & Paoletti, P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2005-01-12
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 308-317
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2029922642
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Micromolar Zinc-Binding Domain on the NMDA Receptor Subunit NR2B. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.3967-04.2005
- The paper
- Rachline, J., Perin-Dureau, F., Le Goff, A., Neyton, J., & Paoletti, P. (2005). The Micromolar Zinc-Binding Domain on the NMDA Receptor Subunit NR2B. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3967-04.2005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.