Maternal Loss of Ube3a Impairs Experience-Driven Dendritic Spine Maintenance in the Developing Visual Cortex
Open accessAbstract
Dendritic spines are a morphological feature of the majority of excitatory synapses in the mammalian neocortex and are motile structures with shapes and lifetimes that change throughout development. Proper cortical development and function, including cortical contributions to learning and memory formation, require appropriate experience-dependent dendritic spine remodeling. Dendritic spine abnormalities have been reported for many neurodevelopmental disorders, including Angelman syndrome (AS), which is caused by the loss of the maternally inherited UBE3A allele (encoding ubiquitin protein ligase E3A). Prior studies revealed that UBE3A protein loss leads to reductions in dendritic spine density and diminished excitatory synaptic transmission. However, the decrease in spine density could come from either a reduction in spine formation or an increase in spine elimination. Here, we used acute and longitudinal in vivo two-photon microscopy to investigate developmental and experience-dependent changes in the numbers, dynamics, and morphology of layer 5 pyramidal neuron apical dendritic spines in the primary visual cortex of control and AS model mice (Ube3am−/p+mice). We found that neurons in AS model mice undergo a greater elimination of dendritic spines than wild-type mice during the end of the first postnatal month. However, when raised in darkness, spine density and dynamics were indistinguishable between control and AS model mice, which indicates that decreased spine density in AS model mice reflects impaired experience-driven spine maintenance. Our data thus demonstrate an experience-dependent anatomical substrate by which the loss of UBE3A reduces dendritic spine density and disrupts cortical circuitry. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Reduced dendritic spine densities are common in the neurodevelopmental disorder Angelman syndrome (AS). Because prior reports were based on postmortem tissue, it was unknown whether this anatomical deficit arises from decreased spine formation and/or increased spine elimination. Here, we used in vivo two-photon imaging to track spines over multiple days in a mouse model of AS. We found that spine formation is normal, but experience-dependent spine maintenance is reduced in the visual cortex of AS model mice. Our data pinpoint the anatomical process underlying the loss of dendritic spines, which can account for the decreased excitatory synaptic connectivity associated with AS. Therefore, normalizing spine maintenance is a potential therapeutic strategy.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Ube3am−/p+ mice, there are more thin spines and fewer stubby spines than in wild-type.
“with more thin spines and fewer stubby spines in the disease model than in the WT [196]”
From Autism spectrum disorder: neuropathology and animal models (2017) · cites this paper as [196]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 65
- Authors
- Kim, H., Kunz, P. A., Mooney, R., Philpot, B. D., & Smith, S. L.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2016-04-27
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 4888-4894
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC4846678
- OpenAlex
- W2344619433
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 3.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
- UNC Libraries
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1450824)
- Autism Speaks
- Simons Foundation (325407SS, 274426, SFARI#274426)
- Whitehall Foundation
- Angelman Syndrome Foundation
- Autism Science Foundation
- Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH093372)
- National Eye Institute (R01EY024294)
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC002524)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS085093, P30NS045892)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U54HD079124, P30HD003110, T32HD040127)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Keywords
- UBE3A, Angelman syndrome, dendritic spines, experience-dependent synaptic plasticity, primary visual cortex, layer 5 pyramidal neurons, neurodevelopmental disorders, spine dynamics
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Dendrites, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Genotype, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Synapses, Visual Cortex, Angelman Syndrome, Pyramidal Cells, Neocortex, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Dendritic Spines, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review