Cited by 285Autophagy in Disease and TherapyNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Neuronal stimulation induces autophagy in hippocampal neurons that is involved in AMPA receptor degradation after chemical long-term depression

Open access
Shehata, Mohammad, Matsumura, Hiroyuki, Okubo-Suzuki, Reiko, Ohkawa, Noriaki, Inokuchi, Kaoru·2012·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Many studies have reported the roles played by regulated proteolysis in synaptic plasticity and memory, but the role of autophagy in neurons remains unclear. In mammalian cells, autophagy functions in the clearance of long-lived proteins and organelles and in adaptation to starvation. In neurons, although autophagy-related proteins (ATGs) are highly expressed, autophagic activity markers, autophagosome (AP) number, and light chain protein 3-II (LC3-II) are low compared with other cell types. In contrast, conditional knock-out of ATG5 or ATG7 in mouse brain causes neurodegeneration and behavioral deficits. Therefore, this study aimed to test whether autophagy is especially regulated in neurons to adapt to brain functions. In cultured rat hippocampal neurons, we found that KCl depolarization transiently increased LC3-II and AP number, which was partially inhibited with APV, an NMDA receptor (NMDAR) inhibitor. Brief low-dose NMDA, a model of chemical long-term depression (chem-LTD), increased LC3-II with a time course coincident with Akt and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) dephosphorylation and degradation of GluR1, an AMPA receptor (AMPAR) subunit. Downstream of NMDAR, the protein phosphatase 1 inhibitor okadaic acid, PTEN inhibitor bpV(HOpic), autophagy inhibitor wortmannin, and short hairpin RNA-mediated knockdown of ATG7 blocked chem-LTD-induced autophagy and partially recovered GluR1 levels. After chem-LTD, GFP-LC3 puncta increased in spines and in dendrites when AP-lysosome fusion was blocked. These results indicate that neuronal stimulation induces NMDAR-dependent autophagy through PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway inhibition, which may function in AMPAR degradation, thus suggesting autophagy as a contributor to NMDAR-dependent synaptic plasticity and brain functions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.4533-11.2012

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Autophagy may remodel dendritic spines by directing internalized postsynaptic membrane neurotransmitter receptors, including GABA-A and AMPAR, toward lysosomal degradation.

    “Autophagy may remodel dendritic spines by directing internalized postsynaptic membrane neurotransmitter receptors, including GABA-A (Rowland et al., 2006) and AMPAR (Shehata et al., 2012), toward lysosomal degradation.”

    From Loss of mTOR-Dependent Macroautophagy Causes Autistic-like Synaptic Pruning Deficits (2014) · cites this paper as Shehata et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 285

Authors
Shehata, M., Matsumura, H., Okubo-Suzuki, R., Ohkawa, N., & Inokuchi, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Toyama (JP)
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency (JP)
Corresponding author
Inokuchi, Kaoru
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2012-07-25
Volume
32
Issue
30
Pages
10413-10422
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2006001960
Cited by
285
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12
FWCI
8.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Uehara Memorial Foundation (CREST)
  • Mitsubishi Foundation
  • Kitasato University
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (24650164, 23220009, CREST)
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency (CREST)
  • Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
autophagy, hippocampal neurons, GluR1, NMDA receptor, PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, ATG7, LC3-II, autophagosomes, synaptic plasticity, okadaic acid, wortmannin, dendritic spines
MeSH terms
Animals, Autophagy, Cells, Cultured, Hippocampus, Neurons, Phosphorylation, N-Methylaspartate, Receptors, AMPA, Excitatory Amino Acid Agonists, Long-Term Synaptic Depression, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt, Mice, Rats, TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review