Amygdala Central Nucleus Interacts with Dorsolateral Striatum to Regulate the Acquisition of Habits
Open accessAbstract
The role of the amygdala central nucleus (CeN) in habit learning was assessed in two experiments. First, we examined the effects of bilateral lesions of the anterior CeN on an overtraining-induced lever press habit evaluated using an outcome devaluation protocol. Overtraining generated habitual performance and rendered sham lesioned rats insensitive to outcome devaluation, an effect that was also found in rats given control lesions of the posterior CeN. In contrast, rats with lesions of the anterior CeN did not show normal habit acquisition and their performance remained goal-directed and sensitive to outcome devaluation. Nevertheless, lesions of either the posterior or the anterior CeN abolished the general excitatory influence of a Pavlovian conditioned stimulus on instrumental performance. Second, we assessed the functional interaction between the CeN and dorsolateral striatum (DLS), a region previously implicated in the acquisition of habits, using asymmetrical lesions to disconnect these structures. Rats were given a unilateral lesion of anterior CeN and a unilateral lesion of the DLS, made either ipsilateral (control) or contralateral (disconnection) to the CeN lesion, and given overtraining followed by outcome devaluation. Although the ipsilateral lesioned rats were insensitive to devaluation, the contralateral CeN–DLS lesion impaired habit acquisition, rendering performance sensitive to the devaluation treatment. These results are the first to implicate the CeN and its connection with a circuit involving DLS in habit learning. They imply that, in instrumental conditioning, regions of amygdala parse the instrumental outcome into the reward and reinforcement signals mediating goal-directed and habitual actions, respectively.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The central nucleus of the amygdala is mainly critical for the formation of habits by its interaction with the DLS.
“recent studies show that the (central nucleus of the) amygdala is mainly critical for the formation of habits by its interaction with the DLS (Lingawi and Balleine, 2012).”
From The role of habit in compulsivity (2016) · cites this paper as Lingawi and Balleine, 2012
The central amygdala has been implicated in habit.
“Conversely, the central amygdala (CeA) has been implicated in habit32.”
From A dual-pathway architecture for stress to disrupt agency and promote habit (2025) · cites this paper as [32]
CeA lesion disrupts habit.
“that CeA lesion disrupts habit32”
From A dual-pathway architecture for stress to disrupt agency and promote habit (2025) · cites this paper as [32]
The CeA is necessary for habit.
“The CeA is necessary for habit32.”
From A dual-pathway architecture for stress to disrupt agency and promote habit (2025) · cites this paper as [32]
The CeA can work indirectly via the midbrain with the dorsolateral striatum to regulate habit formation.
“The CeA can also work indirectly, likely via the midbrain67,68, with the dorsolateral striatum to regulate habit formation32,66.”
From A dual-pathway architecture for stress to disrupt agency and promote habit (2025) · cites this paper as [32]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 172
- Authors
- Lingawi, N. W., & Balleine, B. W.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Balleine, Bernard W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2012-01-18
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1073-1081
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC3711777
- OpenAlex
- W2113679854
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 9.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Medical Research Council
- Australian Research Council
- National Health and Medical Research Council (633267)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R29MH056446, MH56446, R01MH056446)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD059257)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- central amygdala, dorsolateral striatum, habit learning, overtraining, outcome devaluation, operant conditioning, goal-directed behavior
- MeSH terms
- Amygdala, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Conditioning, Classical, Conditioning, Operant, Corpus Striatum, Denervation, Eating, Extinction, Psychological, Food Deprivation, Food Preferences, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Habits, Ibotenic Acid, Male, Myelin Sheath, Sucrose, Transfer, Psychology, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review