The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dopamine, But Not Serotonin, Regulates Reversal Learning in the Marmoset Caudate Nucleus
Open accessAbstract
Studies of visual discrimination reversal learning have revealed striking neurochemical dissociations at the level of the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) with serotoninergic, but not dopaminergic, integrity being important for successful reversal learning. These findings have considerable implications for disorders such as obsessive compulsive disorder and schizophrenia, in which reversal learning is impaired, and which are primarily treated with drugs targeting the dopaminergic and serotoninergic systems. Dysfunction in such disorders however, is not limited to the OFC and extends subcortically to other structures implicated in reversal learning, such as the medial caudate nucleus. Therefore, because the roles of the serotonin and dopamine within the caudate nucleus are poorly understood, this study compared the effects of selective serotoninergic or selective dopaminergic depletions of the marmoset medial caudate nucleus on serial discrimination reversal learning. All monkeys were able to learn novel stimulus–reward associations but, unlike control monkeys and monkeys with selective serotoninergic medial caudate depletions, dopamine-depleted monkeys were markedly impaired in their ability to reverse this association. This impairment was not perseverative in nature. These findings are the opposite of those seen in the OFC and provide evidence for a neurochemical double dissociation between the OFC and medial caudate in the regulation of reversal learning. Although the specific contributions of these monoamines within the OFC–striatal circuit remain to be elucidated, these findings have profound implications for the development of drugs designed to remediate some of the cognitive processes underlying impaired reversal learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Depletion of dopamine in this brain region, but not in the OFC, caused deficits in marmosets (Clarke et al 2011, Clarke et al 2007)”
From Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease (2018) · cites this paper as Clarke et al 2011
In the citing paper
“and dopamine depletion in those brain areas impairs cognitive control (Clarke et al., 2011; Collins et al., 2000; Crofts et al., 2001; O'Neill and Brown, 2007).”
From Imaging addiction: D2 receptors and dopamine signaling in the striatum as biomarkers for impulsivity (2014) · cites this paper as Clarke et al., 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A neural substrate of prediction and reward
Schultz, W., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5306.1593 · Cited by 9,388
Statistical Methods for Psychology.
Gudgeon, A. C., & Howell, D. C. (1994) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) · doi:10.2307/2348956 · Cited by 8,277
Beaton, A. E., & Keppel, G. (1975) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1162588 · Cited by 5,857
Detection Theory: A User's Guide
Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1991) · Cited by 5,415
Barto, A. (1998) · IFAC Proceedings Volumes · doi:10.1016/s1474-6670(17)38315-5 · Cited by 2,172
A framework for mesencephalic dopamine systems based on predictive Hebbian learning
Montague, P., Dayan, P., & Sejnowski, T. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-05-01936.1996 · Cited by 2,066
Zhang, B., Li, C., & Lin, N. (2020) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110595567-011 · Cited by 1,948
Dissociation in prefrontal cortex of affective and attentional shifts
Dias, R., Robbins, T. W., & Roberts, A. C. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/380069a0 · Cited by 1,527
Self-citationNeuronal Coding of Prediction Errors
Schultz, W., & Dickinson, A. (2000) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.473 · Cited by 1,427
Ventral tegmental (A10) system: neurobiology. 1. Anatomy and connectivity
Oades, R. D., & Halliday, G. M. (1987) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/0165-0173(87)90011-7 · Cited by 1,001
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 10.1037/0735-7044.111.5.920 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Inhibition and impulsivity: behavioral and neural basis of response control
Bari, A., & Robbins, T. W. (2013) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.06.005 · Cited by 1,921
Self-citationThe neural basis of reversal learning: An updated perspective
Izquierdo, A., Brigman, J. L., Radke, A. K., Rudebeck, P. H., & Holmes, A. (2017) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.03.021 · Cited by 670
Neurophysiology of performance monitoring and adaptive behavior
Ullsperger, M., Danielmeier, C., & Jocham, G. (2014) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00041.2012 · Cited by 634
Obsessive-compulsive disorder: Puzzles and prospects
Robbins, T. W., Vaghi, M. M., & Banca, P. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.01.046 · Cited by 510
Self-citationFloresco, S. B. (2013) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00062 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Clarke, H. F., Hill, G. J., Robbins, T. W., & Roberts, A. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Clarke, Hannah F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2011-03-16
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4290-4297
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC3083841
- OpenAlex
- W1966180070
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 5.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- James S. McDonnell Foundation
- Wellcome Trust (75491, 076274/Z/04/Z, 093875)
- University of Cambridge
- Medical Research Council
- Newnham College, University of Cambridge
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- reversal learning, dopamine, serotonin, marmoset, orbitofrontal cortex, perseveration, obsessive-compulsive disorder, schizophrenia, cognitive impairment
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Animals, Callithrix, Caudate Nucleus, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Discrimination Learning, Dopamine, Female, Male, Photic Stimulation, Reversal Learning, Reward, Serotonin, Visual Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
