Cited by 66Memory and Neural MechanismsTactile and Sensory InteractionsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Vibrissa-signaled eyeblink conditioning induces somatosensory cortical plasticity

Open access
Galvez, Roberto, Weiss, Craig, Weible, Aldis P., Disterhoft, John F.·2006·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Whisker deflection conditioned stimuli (CS) were demonstrated to activate physiologically and anatomically defined barrels in the contralateral somatosensory cortex and to support trace-eyeblink conditioned responses when paired with corneal airpuff unconditioned stimuli in rabbits. Analysis of cytochrome-oxidase-stained somatosensory whisker-associated cortical barrels revealed a row-specific expansion of the conditioned compared with the nontrained hemisphere. This expansion was not evident in pseudo-conditioned rabbits, suggesting that this expansion of conditioned cortical barrels in response to a hippocampal- and forebrain-dependent learning task (trace conditioning) is associative rather than activity dependent. Using whisker stimulation as a CS in the well studied eyeblink conditioning paradigm will facilitate characterizing sensory cortical involvement in controlling and modulating an associatively learned response at the neural systems and cellular level.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.5582-05.2006

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 77 · Cited by 66

Authors
Galvez, R., Weiss, C., Weible, A. P., & Disterhoft, J. F.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2006-05-31
Volume
26
Issue
22
Pages
6062-6068
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2005407591
Cited by
66
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (T32 AG-20506, T32AG020506)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH-47340, R01MH047340)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
eyeblink conditioning, trace conditioning, somatosensory cortex, cortical plasticity, barrel cortex, whisker stimulation, conditioned stimulus, associative learning, cytochrome c oxidase, hippocampus-dependent learning, rabbits
MeSH terms
Animals, Blinking, Cerebral Cortex, Conditioning, Psychological, Electron Transport Complex IV, Electrophysiology, Female, Functional Laterality, Neuronal Plasticity, Physical Stimulation, Rabbits, Somatosensory Cortex, Stereotaxic Techniques, Vibrissae, Models, Animal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review