Genetic Targeting of ERK1 Suggests a Predominant Role for ERK2 in Murine Pain Models
Open accessAbstract
The extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) isoforms, ERK1 and ERK2, are believed to be key signaling molecules in nociception and nociceptive sensitization. Studies using inhibitors targeting the shared ERK1/2 upstream activator, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK), and transgenic mice expressing a dominant-negative form of MEK have established the importance of ERK1/2 signaling. However, these techniques do not discriminate between ERK1 and ERK2. To dissect the function of each isoform in pain, we used mice with a targeted genetic deletion of ERK1 [ERK1 knock-out (KO)] to test the hypothesis that ERK1 is required for behavioral sensitization in rodent pain models. Despite activation (phosphorylation) of ERK1 after acute noxious stimulation and in models of chronic pain, we found that ERK1 was not required for formalin-induced spontaneous behaviors, complete Freund's adjuvant-induced heat and mechanical hypersensitivity, and spared nerve injury-induced mechanical hypersensitivity. However, ERK1 deletion did delay formalin-induced long-term heat hypersensitivity, without affecting formalin-induced mechanical hypersensitivity, suggesting that ERK1 partially shapes long-term responses to formalin. Interestingly, ERK1 deletion resulted in elevated basal ERK2 phosphorylation. However, this did not appear to influence nociceptive processing, since inflammation-induced ERK2 phosphorylation and pERK1/2 immunoreactivity in spinal cord were not elevated in ERK1 KO mice. Additionally, systemic MEK inhibition with SL327 (α-[amino[(4-aminophenyl)thio]methylene]-2-(trifluoromethyl)benzeneacetonitrile) attenuated formalin-induced spontaneous behaviors similarly in wild-type and ERK1 KO mice, indicating that unrelated signaling pathways do not functionally compensate for the loss of ERK1. Together, these results suggest that ERK1 plays a limited role in nociceptive sensitization and support a predominant role for ERK2 in these processes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Genetic abrogation of ERK2 has profound deleterious effects on neural functioning, whereas Erk1 KO mice do not exhibit significant impairment in neural functioning.
“For instance, genetic abrogation of ERK2 has profound deleterious effects on neural functioning, whereas Erk1 KO mice do not exhibit significant impairment in neural functioning10192021.”
From Transient blockade of ERK phosphorylation in the critical period causes autistic phenotypes as an adult in mice (2015) · cites this paper as [20]
Many studies reporting that ERK1 and ERK2 play distinct roles in neuronal functioning.
“There are many studies reporting that ERK1 and ERK2 play distinct roles in neuronal functioning.”
From Transient blockade of ERK phosphorylation in the critical period causes autistic phenotypes as an adult in mice (2015) · cites this paper as [20]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 47
- Authors
- Alter, B. J., Zhao, C., Karim, F., Landreth, G. E., & Gereau, R. W.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2010-08-25
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 34
- Pages
- 11537-11547
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC2932641
- OpenAlex
- W1978182636
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 3.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (NS48602, NS057105)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (F30NS061398, R56NS048602, P30NS057105, R01NS048602, NS48602)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
- Keywords
- ERK1, ERK2, nociception, nociceptive sensitization, formalin-induced pain, complete Freund's adjuvant, spared nerve injury, mechanical hypersensitivity, heat hypersensitivity, MEK inhibition, SL327, spinal cord, ERK1/2 phosphorylation, chronic pain
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Pain, Pain Measurement, Mice, Knockout, Gene Targeting, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review