CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3Central European national historyReformation and Early Modern ChristianityHistorical and Cultural Studies of Poland

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

"Germania Slavica" und "Polonia Ruthenica": Religiöse Divergenz in ethno-kulturellen Grenz- und Kontaktzonen des mittelalterlichen Osteuropa (8.-16. Jahrhundert)

·2007·Grenzräume und Grenzüberschreitungen im Vergleich
DOI 10.1524/9783050048475.175
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

"Germania Slavica" und "Polonia Ruthenica": Religiöse Divergenz in ethno-kulturellen Grenz- und Kontaktzonen des mittelalterlichen Osteuropa (8.-16. Jahrhundert) was published in Grenzräume und Grenzüberschreitungen im Vergleich on page 175.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1524/9783050048475.175

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Venue
Grenzräume und Grenzüberschreitungen im Vergleich
Publisher
Akademie Verlag
Published
2007
Pages
175-190
DOI
10.1524/9783050048475.175
OpenAlex
W2493002031
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.77
Type
book chapter
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
Akademie Verlag eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Central European national history
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical and Cultural Studies of Poland
Keywords
contact zone, medieval Eastern Europe, Slavs, Ruthenians

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review