Cited by 705Radioactive element chemistry and processingNuclear Materials and PropertiesNuclear and radioactivity studies

Nagra/PSI Chemical Thermodynamic Data Base 01/01

Open access
Hummel, W., Berner, U., Curti, E., Pearson, F. J., Thoenen, T.·2002·Radiochimica Acta

Abstract

Summary The Nagra/PSI Chemical Thermodynamic Data Base has been updated to support performance assessments of the planned Swiss repositories for radioactive waste. The update from version 05/92 to 01/01 involved major revisions for most of the actinides and fission products. Altogether, more than 70% of the database contents have been revised. Data for U, Np, Pu, Am and Tc recommended by the NEA TDB project were considered in the update. Thermodynamic data for Th, Sn, Eu, Pd, Al, and solubility and metal complexation of sulphides and silicates were extensively reviewed. Data for Zr, Ni and Se were examined less rigorously as these elements are currently being reviewed in phase II of the NEA TDB project. Our experiences from this two year team effort can be summarised as follows. Detailed in-house reviews and critical appraisal of NEA recommendations greatly improved the chemical consistency and quality of the selected data. On the other hand, we could discern major gaps in the data, especially missing carbonate complexes. In some systems, e.g . Th(IV)-H 2 O and U(IV)-H 2 O, experimental data could not be described by a unique set of thermodynamic constants. There, a pragmatic approach based on solubility data was chosen for application to performance assessment. The electronic version of our database and information concerning its full documentation is available on our PSI web site ( http://www.psi.ch/les ).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1524/ract.2002.90.9-11_2002.805

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When carbon capture and utilization/storage applications are aimed, metastable hydrated Mg carbonates display losses of sequestrated CO2 and/or volumetric instability during conversion among these carbonates.

    “Despite the relative fast precipitation of the hydrated phases, when carbon capture and utilization/storage applications are aimed these metastable minerals display losses of sequestrated CO 2 and/or volumetric instability during the conversion among these carbonates.73”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hummel, W., Berner, U., Curti, E., Pearson, F. J., & Thoenen, T.
Affiliations
Paul Scherrer Institute (CH)
Venue
Radiochimica Acta
Published
2002-09-01
Volume
90
Issue
9-11
Pages
805-813
ISSN
  • 0033-8230 (ISSN-L)
  • 2193-3405
OpenAlex
W2011744114
Cited by
705
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 36
FWCI
7.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Radiochimica Acta (publishedVersion)
  • DORA PSI (Paul Scherrer Institute) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Nationale Genossenschaft für die Lagerung radioaktiver Abfälle
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Radioactive element chemistry and processing
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nuclear Materials and Properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Nuclear and radioactivity studies
Keywords
nuclear waste repository, performance evaluation, actinides, fission products, solubility, metal complexation, sulfide, silicate, uranium, thorium, neptunium, plutonium, americium, technetium, data quality assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review