Cited by 50Ancient Egypt and ArchaeologyClassical Antiquity StudiesBiblical Studies and Interpretation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The date of the dishonoring of Hatshepsut

NIMS, CHARLES F.·1966·Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1524/zaes.1966.93.1.97

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The destruction of Hatshepsut's monuments was initiated by Thutmose III, her nephew and successor.

    “This act was initiated by Thutmose III, her nephew and successor (sole reign c. 1458-1425 BC), but the motivation behind it remains contentious (Nims 1966;Dorman 1988: 46-65;Laboury 1998: 483-512;Arnold 2005;Roth 2005: 280-81;Bryan 2012: 365-69;Kapiec 2021: 121-34).”

    From The afterlife of Hatshepsut’s statuary (2025) · cites this paper as Nims 1966

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
NIMS, C. F.
Corresponding author
NIMS, CHARLES F.
Venue
Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde
Published
1966-01-01
Volume
93
Issue
1
Pages
97-100
ISSN
  • 0044-216X (ISSN-L)
  • 2196-713X
OpenAlex
W4232411287
Cited by
50
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Keywords
Hatshepsut, chronology, ancient Egyptian queens, Amun temple

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review