The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The date of the dishonoring of Hatshepsut
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The destruction of Hatshepsut's monuments was initiated by Thutmose III, her nephew and successor.
“This act was initiated by Thutmose III, her nephew and successor (sole reign c. 1458-1425 BC), but the motivation behind it remains contentious (Nims 1966;Dorman 1988: 46-65;Laboury 1998: 483-512;Arnold 2005;Roth 2005: 280-81;Bryan 2012: 365-69;Kapiec 2021: 121-34).”
From The afterlife of Hatshepsut’s statuary (2025) · cites this paper as Nims 1966
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The afterlife of Hatshepsut’s statuary
Wong, J. Y. (2025) · Antiquity · doi:10.15184/aqy.2025.64 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- NIMS, C. F.
- Corresponding author
- NIMS, CHARLES F.
- Venue
- Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 1966-01-01
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-100
- ISSN
- 0044-216X (ISSN-L)
- 2196-713X
- OpenAlex
- W4232411287
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Keywords
- Hatshepsut, chronology, ancient Egyptian queens, Amun temple
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review