Cited by 7Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterialsChromium effects and bioremediation

Kinetic Models on Chromium (VI) Adsorption onto Carbonized Oil Palm Kernel with Potassium Hydroxide Activation

Open access
·2016·International Journal of Advances in Chemical Engineering and Biological Sciences

Abstract

Use of adsorption kinetic models for removal of chromium (VI) from aqueous solution by oil palm kernel with potassium hydroxide activation has been investigated.The adsorption capacity or amount of Cr(VI) adsorbed per unit mass of adsorbent was determined by the pseudo-zero order, pseudo-first order, pseudosecond order, intraparticle diffusion, Bangham pore diffusion, liquid film diffusion, modified Freundlich and Elovich models to describe the adsorption process.The kinetics data were marginally better fit with Elovich model as compared to other models.It is therefore suggest that the chemisorption was the rate controlling step for chromium (VI) adsorption onto the carbonized oil palm kernel with KOH activation as the adsorbent.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15242/ijacebs.u0416211

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The deviation from the origin indicated some degree of boundary layer control.

    “This indicated that there is some degree of boundary layer control and this further showed that the intra-particle diffusion was not only the rate-limiting step, but also be the rate controlling of sorption or that all may be operating simultaneously [15].”

    From Equilibrium and Kinetic Studies for The Adsorptive Removal of Lead (II) Ions from Aqueous Solution Using Activated Plantain Peel Biochar (2020) · cites this paper as [15]

    In the intraparticle-diffusion discussion (indexed under B.3; page not provided), the paper says plots that did not pass through the origin indicate that intraparticle diffusion was not the only rate-limiting step. It does not identify boundary-layer control as the other mechanism; the liquid-film diffusion discussion (indexed under B.5; page not provided) instead says the adsorption kinetics were not controlled by diffusion through the surrounding liquid film. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Intra-particle diffusion was not only the rate-limiting step, but also may be rate controlling, or all mechanisms may operate simultaneously.

    “This indicated that there is some degree of boundary layer control and this further showed that the intra-particle diffusion was not only the rate-limiting step, but also be the rate controlling of sorption or that all may be operating simultaneously [15].”

    From Equilibrium and Kinetic Studies for The Adsorptive Removal of Lead (II) Ions from Aqueous Solution Using Activated Plantain Peel Biochar (2020) · cites this paper as [15]

    The intraparticle-diffusion discussion (B.3/B.4; page unavailable) says intraparticle diffusion is not the only rate-limiting step and that another kinetic model may control adsorption. It does not say all mechanisms operate simultaneously. The liquid-film discussion (B.5/B.6; page unavailable) instead reports that adsorption is not controlled by diffusion through the surrounding liquid film, so it does not establish the sentence’s boundary-layer-control assertion. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 8 · Cited by 7

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. P. Sampranpiboon, and X. Feng, "Use of Phosphoric Acid and Sodium Hydroxide to Treat Carbonization Products of Oil Palm Kernel for Chromium (VI) Removal", in Proc. The 4th TIChE International Conference 2014, pp. 1-7.
  2. G.Varak, A. Demir, K. Yetimezsoy, S. Top, E. Sekman and M.S. Bilgili, "Removal of 4-nitrophenol from aqueous solution by natural low-cost adsorpbents", Indain Journal of Chemical Technology, vol.12, pp. 7-25, 2012.

Venue
International Journal of Advances in Chemical Engineering and Biological Sciences
Published
2016-04-30
Volume
3
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 2349-1507 (ISSN-L)
  • 2349-1515
OpenAlex
W4240841938
Cited by
7
References
8
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal of Advances in Chemical Engineering and Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Chromium effects and bioremediation
Keywords
Cr(VI) adsorption, adsorption kinetics, KOH activation, biosorbent, Elovich model, chemisorption, heavy metal removal from water, modified Freundlich isotherm, intraparticle diffusion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review