The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Studies in the Theory of Ideology
Abstract
In this volume John B. Thompson examines some of the outstanding contemporary contributions to the study of ideology. He focuses primarily on European social theorists and philosophers, providing concise and critical appraisals of their work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment
Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611 · Cited by 9,953
Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method
Jørgensen, M., & Phillips, L. (2002) · doi:10.4135/9781849208871 · Cited by 4,118
Discourse: A Critical Introduction
Blommaert, J. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511610295 · Cited by 2,369
Accent, standard language ideology, and discriminatory pretext in the courts
Lippi-Green, R. (1994) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s0047404500017826 · Cited by 455
There's No Such Thing as Culture: Towards a Reconceptualization of the Idea of Culture in Geography
Mitchell, D. (1995) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.2307/622727 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Thompson, J. B.
- Venue
- University of California Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of California Press
- Published
- 1984-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W2042261130
- Cited by
- 1,385
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 81.18
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Studies in the Theory of Ideology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1525/9780520312234
- The paper
- Thompson, J. B. (1984). Studies in the Theory of Ideology. University of California Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520312234
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
