CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 153Computational and Text Analysis MethodsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingReliability and Agreement in Measurement

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Manual of Instructions for Using the Gottschalk-Gleser Content Analysis Scales

Gottschalk, Louis A., Winget, Carolyn N., Gleser, Goldine C.·1969·University of California Press eBooks
DOI 10.1525/9780520318816
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Manual of Instructions for Using the Gottschalk-Gleser Content Analysis Scales by Louis A. Gottschalk, Carolyn N. Winget, Goldine C. Gleser was published on October 26, 2020 by University of California Press.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/9780520318816

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 153

Related

Metadata

Authors
Gottschalk, L. A., Winget, C. N., & Gleser, G. C.
Venue
University of California Press eBooks
Publisher
University of California Press
Published
1969-12-31
DOI
10.1525/9780520318816
OpenAlex
W3134626641
Cited by
152
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
17.33
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
University of California Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
Keywords
content analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review